![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Regarding the "International" subsection of the "Cato positions on political issues and policies" section
I have marked this section as being written like an advertisement, since it makes no effort to rework Cato's stated positions in an encyclopedic, neutral way. 64.203.244.11 (talk) 14:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Severe NPOV Problem
There exists no section on criticism, even though many have commented on contributions to climate denialism, and smoking lobbying, etc. Onhand I have no specific examples but I’m sure they could be found rather easily. 2600:4041:5804:2500:6056:CFD4:8105:DB7 (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Criticism is good, especially on this anti-science organization, but criticism sections are not. See WP:CSECTION. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Formerly called Charles Koch Foundation?
The sidebar lists this organization as formerly the "Charles Koch Foundation" and "Cato Foundation," but the article states, "The institute was founded in January 1977 in San Francisco, California; named at the suggestion of cofounder Murray Rothbard after Cato's Letters …"
If these were indeed earlier names, then an explanation should be given under "History" with a citation. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 23:01, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
You must be logged in to post a comment.