GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Bharali (1615)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Garudam (talk · contribs) 21:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Matarisvan (talk · contribs) 07:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Garudam, my comments:

  • The infobox image is not necessary. I have removed it.
  • How do we know the exact co-ordinates of the battle? We can say the co-ordinates mark the mouth of the Bharali river.
  • "While the Naga tribes of present-day Nagaland accepted Ahom suzerainty, they did not pay tribute. Assam was renowned for its elephants, gold, silk, and its principal crops—rice and betel leaves.[5]": These details are not relevant at all to this article. Please remove them.
  • There were many unnecessary images. I have removed them. Please remember that you should add only relevant images. If this was a Featured Article nomination, it would have been failed because of the multiple irrelevant images.
  • Remember to use pp. when citing more than one page.

I will post my other comments soon. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 07:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking this to review, Matarisvan. You're right -- the infobox image is redundant or, rather, irrelevant. The battle was basically fought somewhere around the river, so I'm also unsure whether one should still pin the coordinates of the riverside or simply omit them. I've taken care of the other extraneous details and noted the pp point. Thanks for copyediting and handling the unnecessary images -- I'll heed your advice regarding this. – Garuda Talk! 14:26, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Garudam, one prose comment before we do the image and source reviews: What is the connection between the battle/skirmish at Pandu and the battle of Bharali? You say the former occurred in 1606, and the latter occurred in 1615. If the latter was a continuation of the former battle, then we should clarify that. If not, we should remove that infomration. Matarisvan (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well of course Matarisvan, take your time and feel free to comment. So far, I have only found the connection of Raja Parikshit (brother of Baldev, who led the Siege of Pandu) fighting Satrajit, who was involved in the Battle of Bharali, under the promise made by Qasim Khan (the subahdar) to appoint him as the Thanadar (station chief) of the previously defended Pandu. The exact quote in the source[1] goes as:

Satrajit, the son of a zamindar near Dhaka, who had fought Parikshit was also sent with the Mughal force and the subadar promised to make him the thanadar of Pandu and Gauhati.

I'd be promptly willing to remove this 'Siege of Pandu' part if you think this is still not very much relevant to the topic. – Garuda Talk! 23:23, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Garudam, now that you've clarified this, I don't think this text needs to be removed. I'll start the image and source reviews soon. Cheers Matarisvan (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very well then @Matarisvan. Glad that, I was able to explain the relation between background and the battle so that you could proceed further. – Garuda Talk! 18:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Garudam, before we progress with the image review, I think you should add an image of the Bharali river if one is available. Matarisvan (talk)

 Done. Matarisvan, please check if that would do. – Garuda Talk! 18:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Garudam, all the other images are ok, but please remove the link on Commons from the painting of Shahbaz Khan. Matarisvan (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done @Matarisvan. – Garuda Talk! 19:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

  1. ^ Nag 2023, p. 181.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Bharali_(1615)
No tags for this post.