Wikipedia talk:Proposed article mergers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) add my comment |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Gaia Theory]] says in the first line "'''Gaia Theory''' of [[Lynn Margulis]] and others is one among other [[Gaia theory|Gaia theories]]" ("Gaia theories" links to [[Gaia theory]]). Likewise, the capitalised article is linked to in the lower case article. Possibly there is a better way to distinguish between these two articles, but they clearly are not talking about the same thing. --[[User:Camembert|Camembert]] |
[[Gaia Theory]] says in the first line "'''Gaia Theory''' of [[Lynn Margulis]] and others is one among other [[Gaia theory|Gaia theories]]" ("Gaia theories" links to [[Gaia theory]]). Likewise, the capitalised article is linked to in the lower case article. Possibly there is a better way to distinguish between these two articles, but they clearly are not talking about the same thing. --[[User:Camembert|Camembert]] |
||
Sorry my comment was not good enough. I meant I don't think many people distinguish them well. We really shouldn't differenciate articles by upper or lower cases. Yes, they are not identical theories but they are apparently closely related. I think it is a better idea to merge them to one article and discuss the difference between Gaia Theory and Gaia theory. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 02:44 Apr 27, 2003 (UTC) |
|||
:OK, it's been added back - I won't remove it again right away, though I don't think it belongs on this page. This page is to alert people to articles which need to be merged into one, and it looks to me that that would be inappropriate in this case. The "theory" and the "Theory" are not the same thing - one is a subset of the other (just as the [[Gaia hypothesis]] is a subset of [[Gaia theory]], and [[pop music]] is a subset of [[music]]). As I say, I won't remove them again immediately, but it seems to me that they shouldn't be merged into one page. --[[User:Camembert|Camembert]] |
:OK, it's been added back - I won't remove it again right away, though I don't think it belongs on this page. This page is to alert people to articles which need to be merged into one, and it looks to me that that would be inappropriate in this case. The "theory" and the "Theory" are not the same thing - one is a subset of the other (just as the [[Gaia hypothesis]] is a subset of [[Gaia theory]], and [[pop music]] is a subset of [[music]]). As I say, I won't remove them again immediately, but it seems to me that they shouldn't be merged into one page. --[[User:Camembert|Camembert]] |
||
Revision as of 02:44, 27 April 2003
The page says "After a pair has been merged leave it on the list with a remark DONE." Why is that? What is the argument against just removing pairs from the list after they have been done? Andre Engels 10:14 Sep 27, 2002 (UTC)
- None that I can see! I'm all for changing that guideline -- Tarquin
- I would be in favor of making a list of fixed issues at the bottom of the article. Good for follow-up purposes. If the list grows too long, it can be moved to an archives page. olivier 12:23 Nov 9, 2002 (UTC)
For merged articles, I prefer the most international and general name possible. I.e. Islands of the North Atlantic better British Isles. Perhaps a redirection from Islands of the North Atlantic to British Isles Mac 12:02 Mar 9, 2003 (UTC)
For pacifism and Non-violent resistance and Non-violence, I prefer Non-violence because it´s the most general. From there links to pacifism and Non-violent resistance, if the articles have enough content, specially, indicating the differences between they both. More than duplicated (in this case, triplicated) articles, we can talk about non-jerarquiced articles or structured article sequence Mac 12:06 Mar 9, 2003 (UTC) Mac 12:06 Mar 9, 2003 (UTC)
Taku added:
- Gaia Theory and Gaia theory - I think both are talking about the same thing.
Gaia Theory says in the first line "Gaia Theory of Lynn Margulis and others is one among other Gaia theories" ("Gaia theories" links to Gaia theory). Likewise, the capitalised article is linked to in the lower case article. Possibly there is a better way to distinguish between these two articles, but they clearly are not talking about the same thing. --Camembert
Sorry my comment was not good enough. I meant I don't think many people distinguish them well. We really shouldn't differenciate articles by upper or lower cases. Yes, they are not identical theories but they are apparently closely related. I think it is a better idea to merge them to one article and discuss the difference between Gaia Theory and Gaia theory. -- Taku 02:44 Apr 27, 2003 (UTC)
- OK, it's been added back - I won't remove it again right away, though I don't think it belongs on this page. This page is to alert people to articles which need to be merged into one, and it looks to me that that would be inappropriate in this case. The "theory" and the "Theory" are not the same thing - one is a subset of the other (just as the Gaia hypothesis is a subset of Gaia theory, and pop music is a subset of music). As I say, I won't remove them again immediately, but it seems to me that they shouldn't be merged into one page. --Camembert