I know the author Sang Lee, personally, and he would have no problem with this image being used to augment the article PrinceCon under Fair Use doctrine. אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) • Give Back Our Membership! 22:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Update: More criteria as requested:

"What proportion of the copyrighted work is used and to what degree does it compete with the copyright holder's usage?"

It is a low-resolution image of past convention cover art. It does not compete.

"If applicable, has the resolution been reduced from the original? In the case of music samples, has the quality been reduced from the original?"

See above.

What purpose does the image serve in the article? If applicable:

Is the image a logo, photograph, or box art for the main subject of the article?

Yes.

Is the image being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject or topic? (e.g., a corporate logo or the box art of a DVD)

Yes.

Does it illustrate the topic of the article? (e.g., a screen shot from a movie)

Yes.

Is it used for commentary on a particular topic? How?

N/A.

Why the subject can't be adequately conveyed by properly sourced text or using free content media.

There is no official free content visual media pertaining to the Con.

Any other information necessary to assist others in determining whether the use of this copyrighted work qualifies for fair use.

Sadly, the artist Sang Lee, passed on a few years back. It is well within his legacy for this image to be used to demonstrate the character of PrinceCon -- in any context -- as he was an avid participant in the Con who contributed his art freely as a matter of dedication for over a decade. The fact that this artwork is "copyrighted" in this context is a mere technicality.

אמר Steve Caruso 14:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)