This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Switzerland. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Switzerland|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Switzerland. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch
Scan for Switzerland related AfDs

Scan for Switzerland related Prods
Scan for Switzerland related TfDs


Switzerland

Hermann Feierabend (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources found. Fails WP:GNG and only 20 revisions done since its creation. Gauravs 51 (talk) 13:23, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Esad Samardžić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He does not appear to be notable per Wikipedia standards Hardyplants (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Sorry for piling on – I did a search in the two big Swiss newspaper archives, he's mentioned about a dozen times as a football player, but never with sigcov. Most results were simply lists of transferred players. Toadspike [Talk] 09:58, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Stefan Bollinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting general notability. The available source are only of brief event-based nature - connected to his appointment as the CEO Unicorbia (talk) 12:31, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide me with a specific area where it does not meet the guideline?
Presumed - Reuters, Financial times etc have covered him
Significant coverage - Reuters, Financial times etc have covered him - a google search can find more info on him
Reliable - The content is largely based off the articles cited
Sources - Most sentences have one to two sources
Independent of the subject - None of the sources cited have been personally written by him WxProHaha (talk) 10:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. 594 hits on Swissdox makes it hard to choose what sources to link here. From the NZZ alone, Bollinger clearly meets the GNG. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Although his appointment was announced in the middle of 2024, he has only actually been CEO since 9 January 2025 (see link 4 above), so you can't really expect him to have tons of coverage unrelated to him being the new CEO...or can you? Links 1 and 2 above are actually not about his appointment as CEO! And from before his appointment, we have this interview with a short biography at the end [8] and several mentions in another article where he was interviewed as an expert [9]. Add to this that basically all of these stories and many more opinions have been covered in other outlets, like Reuters [10], this very in-depth piece in the Handelszeitung [11], Tages Anzeiger [12], and SRF [13]. Toadspike [Talk] 10:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates

See also

No tags for this post.