Hi KGOO510! I noticed your contributions to Camilla, Queen Consort and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 18:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Queen Camilla, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please note there should be no intervening space between punctuation and a reference. See WP:CITEFOOT. DrKay (talk) 18:10, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Charles III. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per [1], please note there should be no intervening space between punctuation and a reference. See WP:CITEFOOT. DrKay (talk) 09:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You've just done the same thing again at Queen Camilla. It is disruptive to continue a series of edits after being asked to stop. DrKay (talk) 18:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Charles III, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The last part of the Leading section is poorly written, which is acknowledged by everyone involved in the discussion. I don't understand why is not allowed to discuss and revise it? And why must insist on using “the signature events include” version? Charles's reign's major events can be described in detail. His visits to Germany and France were successful and strengthened post-Brexit ties (this is a fact), he continued to work while receiving treatment (this is a fact), and he is the first reigning king to visit Australia (also a fact). I just want to express my view. 223.16.62.17 (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]