The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 17:50, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

• ... that After London has been described as a defining work in the genres such as Ruined Earth and climate fiction genres? Source: https://www.ceeol.com/search/chapter-detail?id=1205833 and https://sf-encyclopedia.com/entry/ruined_earth
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Blood on the Silver Screen
  • Comment: Technical note: if 'created over the period of 9 days is an issue, I think this is eligible due to 5x expansion in word count beyond the stub from 9 days ago and what I am submitting today.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Can't access "Suffering Nature, Suffering Humans: After London As A Portrayal of Anthropocentric Violence" but willing to take it on faith. Hook is interesting enough to accept, though perhaps it should include the year? "climate fiction" feels sufficiently modern than the contrast with 1885 could add interest. Rusalkii (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)