This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Reformed Christianity Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity. United States: Louisville Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as High-importance).

WikiProject Louisville		Cleanup Requested by WikiProject Louisville
		WikiProject Louisville has identified Presbyterian Church (USA) as having an unusually high number of issues, and we could very much use editors' assistance in addressing them. These issues are normally noted by the presence of various cleanup banners and in-line templates as well as the page's placement in hidden categories such as "Articles with unsourced statements...". To see these categories, make sure Show hidden categories is checked in your Preferences. Thank you for your help!

Stefen 𝕋ower_{'s got the power!!1!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 02:35, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s very reasonable to characterize PC(USA)’s theology as Barthian, given Barth’s influence on the church in general since the mid-20th-century and his influence on the Confession of 1967 and Princeton Theological Seminary in particular, to pick two especially prominent examples. But I’m not sure if his influence is *so* much greater than other 1900s Reformed theologians (like Moltmann, for example) so as to warrant specific mention, one way or the other, on the sidebar. Picking him out in particular also has a chance of appearing to gerrymander his thought as outside Reformed theology, which is a bit sectarian and very much a minority opinion against the general consensus. In addition, the sourcing currently used for the claim, in any case, is needing of replacement; the source’s link goes to bulleted summary of a religious education class on the website of some particular congregation in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, a different denomination from PC(USA).

Lastly, I’ve only ever seen “Barthian,” and not “Barthianist.”

Would love to hear others’ input on how to clean this up. I do think preserving the choice of picking out Barth as especially influential is likely worthwhile in *some* capacity. Killjoydetective (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]