Talk:Lymphopoiesis

Untitled

I have been interested in this topic for ever, but became motivated to analyze it more carefully when I realized my son's grade 9 science text made little sense talking about immunology and WBC types. Why not clarify the material in my own mind, and what better discipline than to write/edit/contribute to a Wikipedia article!!!

Here are my initial aspirations for the lympho article, which I would hope someday to achieve- and within Wikipedia guidelines!!!

  • Make it as good as the transcription factor article.
  • Let it connect to and be connected from great articles
  • Make it useful and understandable to a smart high school student, or normal university student
  • Make it a good overview/survey.
  • Include a specific overview/survey section.
  • Leave no unexplained jargon
  • Define it before you use it
  • Set up the hyperlinks/wikilinks carefully
  • Make this a solid (amateur) contribution to the study of immunology
  • Make it so that when an expert reviews, it clarifies/organizes his/her thoughts on the subject
  • Remove all semblance of arrogance or ego
  • Make it easy for the article to be updated or improved
  • Simplify, yes. But make it so that anyone who is curious or needs detail can get all they want... easily
  • Include recent *confirmed* research from quality sources
  • Ask an expert or two for oral/written input.
  • Add original exciting graphics. Cut/paste/redraw; draw
  • Include footnotes for some of the complexity.
  • Remove some detail, move to the footnotes
  • Move some complexity to another specialized article
  • Move some complexity to another specialized article consisting of a big list or set of lists
  • Questions that come naturally to mind from the text should be answered soon and in sequence
  • Write an Article B on the history/development of Article A
  • Have a section on where the field is going; have commentators predict
  • Make High School textbooks on the topic obsolete, ho ho
  • Create a test(s) on the article or related articles taken together!!
  • WikiTest for WikiCertification!!
  • Include the answers to USMLE questions into articles
  • More text books or survey artiles, fewer research papers from journals

Reg C Handford (talk) 15:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow Zaho 02 (talk) 20:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Feel free to participate, esp. if knowledgeable or motivated and careful at checking sources. Also speling is improtant! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Regford (talk • contribs) 17:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

great article!

this is one of the best written articles I have read on Wikipedia. I just want to say thank you and kudos to the author! 75.81.31.187 (talk) 03:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Rene February 5, 2014[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lymphopoiesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FO B cell?

What does FO stand for in the caption MZ B cell to mature (FO) B cell?--Iztwoz (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linked Follicular B cell in caption.--Iztwoz (talk) 06:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary removed

The following glossary sidebar was removed from this article in recent edits. It might be useful to integrate some or all of it into the article.

Lymphopoiesis Glossary
• antigen any molecule that can provoke an immune defense
• B cells lymphocytes that ultimately produce antibodies
• bone marrow the center of bones capable of producing all red and white blood cells in the adult
• cortex the outer portion of any organ
• cytoplasm the portion of a cell between the nucleus and the membrane
• differentiation permanent changes to a cell developing over time and with cell division
• granules grains found in many white blood cells, composed of defensive chemicals
• hematopoietic that which gives rise to any blood cell type
• lineage a type of cell and its descendants by division and differentiation
• lymphocytes a special 'lineage' of WBC
• macrophages myeloid descendants (some may be lymphoid) with 'eating' abilities, also cooperate with lymphocytes
• myeloid ancestors of WBCs with granules and also of macrophages
• T Cells "management" lymphocytes for immunity
• (WBC) White Blood Cell in contrast to the much more common Red Blood Cell; responsible for defense

This content was at {{Lymphopoiesis Glossary}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

allikas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lymphopoiesis