This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Cities / Madhya Pradesh / Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2012. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

moreana railway line touched. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.17.98 (talk) 16:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a statement in the text:

"Jats are not related in any way to Tomar Rajput, they were only Faithful Sevak of Tomars and served the Tomar Dynasty for a long Time. Actually, no Tomar Vanshavallis talks of any connection of Jats with Tomars. Jats are non recognized caste in rulers and Dynasties of India."

This is disputed and has POV statement. Were the Tomar jats of Meerut their servants or the Jat rulers of Patiala, Bharatpur and Dholpur their servants? Were they not recognized as rulers ? History needs to be written with NPOV.burdak (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Morena → Morena, Madhya Pradesh
• Morena (disambiguation) → Morena

– The political party has surpassed the interest of the city for a while. [1] (CC) Tbhotch^™ 05:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support, no PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 06:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Per WP:DPT let's have a look at some more stats:

• all-time mass views here
• all-time mass views given name
• all-time mass views surname

So actually the most interest in topics named Morena is in a biography, Morena Baccarin. Let's check any trends for recentism:

• all-time monthly page views for the top items

The biography has received orders of magnitude higher reader interest consistently over the years. (Logarithmic view is needed.) Even if we remove the top two items from the data set, the result is also not a graph indicating a primary topic by usage for the city.

I don't see any overwhelming long-term significance argument, either.

This seems like a no-brainer - there's no reason to believe that the average English reader looks up Morena and expects to read about the city in India. Rather, some portion of readers are probably genuinely confused, which is a violation of the principle of least astonishment. (Support) --Joy (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Makes perfect sense. Moscow Mule (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]