This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

I have created a new page about the italian company qc Terme and i woukd greatly appreciate your help in reviewing it.I need the page to be approved by December 31st. The draft is called Draft:QC_Terme . I would be grateful for any feedback or suggestions to make the article acceptable for publication.

Millennium Interactive's Wikipedia entry survived a deletion vote in 2007, but was redirected to its successor company by an editor in 2017. I would imagine Millennium, which released over 30 games, to be notable in its own right, but since most of its activity was pre-web, it is hard to find independent sources. The argument has been made that reviews of the company's games do not confer noteworthiness, as per WP:COMPANY.

I would therefore be interested if someone could find relevant sources to establish noteworthiness in order to restore the article. Only a Floor Tile (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answered at Talk:Guerrilla Cambridge.--CNMall41 (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 – Thanks for the guidance. I have added "edit COI" to move this request into the COI edit queue. Meredithjg (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you are replying to the right thing @Meredithjg. NotJamestack (✉️|📝) 16:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Meredithjg:, I don't mind helping PAID editors, but it seems you are just throwing things against the wall here. Competency is still required on your part. You have left the template on this page instead of the talk page of the article where it belongs. See WP:COIREQUEST and make sure you understand the proper procedure for making such requests. Otherwise, it is highly unlikely that anyone will respond to your request. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The company has shut down operations and is in the process of going through bankruptcy process and per the sources, it has future meetings with creditors. To me, this isn't a company that had already dissolved. Several temp accounts keep changing it to the past tense, but I believe it's correct to keep it in the present tense until formally recognized as dissolved. What is the standard MOS for companies articles? Graywalls (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Graywalls:, technically it would still be a company until it legally dissolves, even though it ceased operations. I am not really how sure to phrase it but keeping the "is" for the time being is something I would support until we has sources that talk about it in the past tense. I have watchlisted for now.--CNMall41 (talk) 00:43, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi editors, I have an edit request at Soros Fund Management that may be of interest to folks here. Cheers BINK Robin (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WikiProject Companies,

I’ve identified areas in the Robert Half article that could be updated for accuracy and improved sourcing. I’ve drafted a proposed revision in my sandbox and noted this on the article’s Talk page.

As I have a conflict of interest (COI) due to my affiliation with Robert Half, I will not edit the article directly. Feedback and review from independent editors would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ~~~~ NeutralEditorCA (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Titra Studios has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 16 years. Tagged for notability concerns for 6 years. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 12:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on the talk page. Borderline, but I will try if the prod is removed. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:

• "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."

There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower ^{Huddle • Handiwerk} 19:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)[reply]

Hello WikiProject Companies editors. There is a request at Talk:Better.com#Funding_summary if editors care to review it. Disclosure: I am an employee at Better (Better Home & Finance Holding Company). KC at Better (talk) 17:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I submitted a requested article for DigiM Solution at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies/A-E#D articles. I believe it meets notability criteria through secondary sources. Any advice or help from editors would be appreciated. Dhrubojyoti1 (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could use some additional opinions on the source assessment at Jasuben Pizza. Seems to be an issue between what constitutes WP:CORPDEPTH and what constitutes WP:CHURNALISM. CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros.#Requested move 15 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 04:35, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi editors, I have a COI request to update financials in the JBS N.V. article that may be of interest to folks here. I would appreciate any feedback! Hailey at JBS (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on the talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Credit Suisse has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve drafted an article on Joris Ide in Draft space and would appreciate any feedback from editors familiar with construction or building materials companies. Draft:Joris Ide AlexisJRI (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexisJRI:, if you are looking for a review, you will need to click the "submit draft" button near the top of the draft. I did give it a quick look and will tell you it would not pass as the sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Have a look at WP:CORPDEPTH and try to find sources that match that criteria. This is how to show notability in Wikipedia. Also, if you used ChatGTP or another AI-program for assistance, please review it carefully to ensure it is accurate. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: Thanks for the review. I’ve updated the draft to address WP:ORGCRIT/WP:CORPDEPTH by adding multiple independent secondary sources (e.g., national and trade business coverage of the 2015 acquisition) and reducing reliance on primary/company sources. I’ve also cleaned up formatting (duplicate References removed). Would you be willing to take another look?

AlexisJRI (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appears that someone has already reviewed the submission. For any discussion of the content going forward, please use the talk page of the draft so that it is kept in a central location. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:OKD#Requested move 28 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 16:07, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm an employee at Harmony Public Schools, a network of charter schools that operates across the state of Texas. I've placed an edit request to update the article's History section and need someone without a conflict of interest to review it. The request is fairly modest. I'm seeking to improve sourcing of existing content and add a few details about Harmony's early history as well as its growth over the past two decades. If that interests anyone at this WikiProject, you can view my request by following this link. Any help or guidance independent editors can provide would be much appreciated. Thanks! JB for Harmony (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JB for Harmony:, If no one gets around to reviewing, you can ping me in a week or so and I will have a look. Taking a quick look at the page itself, there are quite a few issues that need addressed such as removal of most of the awards as well as the entire section on superintendents which is basically a list of locations. The criticism information also needs to be included elsewhere on the page instead of separate WP:CSECTION. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:52, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:B&M#Requested move 24 December 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 02:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Annovis Bio, Inc. (NYSE: ANVS) and would like to request that an independent editor create an article about the company. I'm disclosing my affiliation per COI guidelines.

Why it's notable: 1. Publicly traded on NYSE since 2020 (ticker: ANVS) https://www.nyse.com/quote/XNYS:ANVS 2. Late-stage clinical biotech with Phase 3 trials in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's 3. Coverage in peer-reviewed journals and financial media

RELIABLE SOURCES: 1. SEC Filings: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001477845&owner=include&count=40 2. ClinicalTrials.gov entries: NCT06709014, NCT05357989, NCT07284784, NCT05686044 3. ALZFORUM database: https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/buntanetap 4. NeurologyLive: "Buntanetap Improves Motor, Nonmotor and Cognitive Symptoms of Parkinson Disease in Phase 3 Study" (Jan 2025) 5. Philadelphia Business Journal: https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2021/05/21/annovis-bio-berwyn-alzheimers-parkinsons.html 6. Clinical Trials Arena: https://www.clinicaltrialsarena.com/news/annovis-subject-alzheimers-trial/ 7. Parkinson's News Today: https://parkinsonsnewstoday.com/buntanetap-parkinsons-disease/ 8. Longevity Technology: https://longevity.technology/news/new-trial-data-supports-alzheimers-drug-candidates-disease-modyfing-potential/ 9. Benzinga: https://www.benzinga.com/news/health-care/25/11/48905832/annovis-bio-stock-jumps-as-new-data-shows-buntanetap-halts-cognitive-decline-in-parkinsons-patients?gc_id=23299677066&g_special_campaign=true&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23299679256&gbraid=0AAAAADMUQ_YRoIoL2F_n7A3i6bv5eDgSK&gclid=Cj0KCQiAgvPKBhCxARIsAOlK_Epdb33yLlOCnzO-CMQ7_vJzZHK-7v3o3tUX7jpb3bPJI3PtlXuAYcoaAhlJEALw_wcB

10. Additional peer-reviewed publications available:

• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36641607/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38970127/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41008606/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38785991/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32975365/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29955650/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30906671/

DRAFT AVAILABLE: I have prepared a neutral draft and comprehensive source list that I can share with any editor who picks up this request. The draft follows Wikipedia guidelines for tone and sourcing. Thank you for considering this request. Please let me know if you need additional information or sources. Sergeevich92 (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergeevich92:, I do not see a link to the draft you have prepared. However, I did find this which is still something you have a conflict of interest with since it is related to the company. Would suggest using the WP:COIREQUEST method moving forward. Once you have the drat ready, you can ping me here and I will take a look for you. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergeevich92:, Unfortunately, that is not how it is done. Please do not copy and paste large amounts of draft text into a talk page message. I created Draft:Annovis Bio for you where you can work on the draft until you feel it is ready for review. I would also suggest reading WP:CIR as it is up to you to create the draft according to Wikipedia guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hotels.com#Arsenal_F.C. Someone representing Expedia Group/Hotels.com is requesting the re-addition of this statement I removed: "In 2023, Hotels.com became a multi-year sponsor of Arsenal's men's and women's teams." Sourced to https://www.90min.com/posts/arsenal-announce-multi-year-partnership-with-hotels-com which is quite rich in comments from Arsenal's as well as Hotels.com/Expedia associated sources. Sports teams and corporations form collaborative marketing and partnerships all the time. The question is whether such inclusion here has encyclopedic merit. I would appreciate editor opinions on this at the talk page. Graywalls (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Graywalls:, Coming here from the talk page of Hotels.com. I honestly do not have an opinion about adding it back or not as I don't know if there is real encyclopedic value or not. Just wanted to comment about the inclusion of sponsorships. I normally lean towards them being promotional and keep them off company pages per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. However, I normally don't see an issue if the company is well known for them. An example would be Coca-Cola and Microsoft. I think the better example to use for inclusion criteria would be Microsoft that gives more of a general summary than an indiscriminate list. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think if there are reliable sources that discuss about it and not written with extensive direct quotes from any of the involved partners, it would be worth mentioning. Otherwise, including it because the partner is a "big wig known name" is too arbitrary. Graywalls (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with you there. I just wanted to make sure there was a distinction between what is going on with Hotels.com and sponsorships in general. Looking closer, I don't think there is encyclopedic value on the Hotels.com page but don't want to suggest we always keep them off company pages as sometimes they are. Maybe it would be different for Hotels.com if this were some type of naming rights such as Crypto.com and Crypto.com Arena (although Crypto.com could use a trim of most of its sponsorship information outside of the arena information). --CNMall41 (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Looked at Crypto.com and trimmed back some there too. I believe it looks like an excuse to feature names bigger, more recognizable and prestigious than the article's company. While some partnerships/sponsorships are notable, many are WP:DOGBITESMAN and each and every A-list celebrity involvement need not be introduced into the article, but what to include or not include is a wide gray area subject to editor consensus beyond just power flashing big name sources and big name involved parties. Graywalls (talk) 12:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly think there should be more trimming but won't disturb the page since you are already editing there.

Sponsorships such as these can go away in favor of short summaries saying they sponsor professional and collegiate sports teams. Things like this is what we want to avoid as they are promotional and only serve the company. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/11/airbnb-and-vrbo-are-teaming-up-to-shut-down-repeat-party-house-offenders.html this kind of partnership would be more contextually relevant than things like NASCAR sponsorship, sports team partnership etc. That example is something that uses quotes, but still includes a fair bit of writing from the journalist. Graywalls (talk) 05:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there as well. I think the takeaways here are that some cases are clearly promo, some are not, but many fall into a "wide gray area subject to editor consensus." Hotels.com likely falls into the third category and I don't see consensus to the addition at this point. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:PNY Technologies#Requested move 6 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vestrian24Bio 08:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiProject Companies!

I have a request on the Talk page for Preply. Currently, the article has some incorrect information about the company's headquarters. This request, in part, seeks to fix this. I am a paid representative so I make requests rather than directly edit. Let me know if you have any questions. Cristina Preply (talk) 08:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just posted this on WikiProject Business but figured I can post here too. Been on Wikipedia for years but haven't taken a deep interest for business/company articles until recently. I did my first long-form article recently, Zapier, and I'd like your feedback on it. Been getting familiarized with all the new policies but would like a gut-check. I want to help take business articles to GA status so any guidance is appreciate. If I'm in the wrong place please let me know, TY. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 05:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Morogris:, you would get more feedback if you opened the GA. There are more editors reviewing GA's than responding here. Good luck. --CNMall41 (talk) 09:20, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: Thank you! I was hoping to get more feedback prior to GA (which I do plan to nominate this later). Wouldn't want to put this in front of a GA review and have it fail. But if that's the only route then I guess that's it! Appreciate the response. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 20:42, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I get that. Nothing wrong with failure. Keep in mind that you will probably get more quality feedback through GA review. That is, assuming you feel it is ready. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RFC in progress at Talk:Maire Tecnimont. Your participation is invited. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Seer (company)#Requested move 2 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ROY is WAR Talk! 04:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kasenna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for Notability concerns for 15 years. Survived a speedy deletion through DGG's intervention. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Fails the relevant notability guidelines. Defunct, so no new sources are available.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Palantir Technologies#Requested move 5 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 10:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I’m reaching out on behalf of Faculty to request assistance with improving the Faculty (company) article. I work for Kekst CNC, which is a signatory to the Industry Statement on Wikipedia, and therefore following guidelines due to our COI.

Over time, the Faculty page has been vandalised as 60% of the content is controversy, but if you check the referenced sources (where there are references), the article indicates guilt-by-association framing, routine practices such as staff moving between firms are positioned to imply wrongdoing without evidence, and Faculty’s actual work isn’t represented or accurately described. As a side point, the firm has just been acquired by Accenture, so professional due-diligence doesn’t align with the ‘facts’ on Wikipedia.

We have two factual NPOV updates to start improving the quality of this page from a C-Class, which are:

1. Remove the controversies section as WP:CRITS clearly outlines these do not follow NPOV. We will then suggest changes to integrate any accurate content from this section rebalancing for NPOV. If you look at the existing content of this section, it has clearly been written by individuals with a view against Faculty.
2. Updating the basic business details about Faculty given all facts and figures require updating (we’re not looking to promote but merely make sure the business is factually represented).

Please can an editor confirm the best way for these changes to be addressed? We’re happy to submit a draft of a new full page for review, for instance. Alternatively, we can provide suggested changes piecemeal.

Thank you for your help. MichaelPWhite (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at Talk:Faculty_(company)#Supporting_factual_updates_for_Faculty. Let's keep the discussion there where it belongs. SmartSE (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to let editors here know that on the Humana Talk page, I have an open request for cleaning up the article's sources. Currently, it relies on press releases, Humana's website, or sites that don't otherwise meet guidelines. There are also several citation needed tags. Let me know if you want to discuss more. E Humana (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Public utility, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Current Skyline employee (full disclosure: User:Lks-1989) seeking review of Draft:Skyline_Communications. Sources meet WP:GNG/WP:NCORP?

- De Tijd 2024 profile (1500+ words): family business, market position - Two Flanders Export Lion awards (VRT NWS 2012/2017) - National Ventilus controversy (nl:Ventilus): returned award in protest (De Tijd, HLN, VRT 2023)

Happy to make suggested improvements. Thank you! Lks-1989 (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sourcebooks (publisher)#Requested move 18 February 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 05:00, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]