Archives

Archive 1

Dear Surayeproject3

You archived my precious topic before I had a chance to answer you question. You asked Why did you thank me for the edit than?’’ My answer is that I accidentally pressed on the thanks instead of '’undo. But that’s not the statement I brought forward, You never answered it. I kindly ask you to stop with your POV. It messes the whole article up when the sources don’t add up with the text. It becomes an misinterpretation of history.

King regard Historynerd361 (talk) 19:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Resident Evil Remake (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Someone wanting to find the remake pages for RE2, 3, or 4 will not simply search "Resident Evil Remake", but rather "Resident Evil 2 Remake", for example. This isn't a valid disambiguation page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 00:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. » Gommeh (he/him) 19:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Miiverse you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 02:02, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Miiverse you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Miiverse for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NegativeMP1 -- NegativeMP1 (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Miiverse is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:09, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Miiverse has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OpalYosutebito -- OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Babylon Movement Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax Is the jpg file being replaced with the png and being deleted because of that? That's what it looks like to me. Surayeproject3 (talk) 04:10, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 04:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For all your great contributions. :-) Kajmer05 (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kajmer05 Thank you so much! Honored to receive the Barnstar, I hope to continue making positive contributions to Wiki and hope to see you around the site as well! Surayeproject3 (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that I de-prodded this, for two reasons: firstly, deleting an article about a Christian leader would only feed our critics; secondly, there is an Egyptian Arabic language article with about 7 citations. Give me 24 hours to enlist help, and then you can go to WP:AfD. Thanks for your patience. Bearian (talk) 02:27, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Although this might be controversial to delete it without community discussion, this one does not appear to be notable. I won't deprod, nor will I second the proposal. If you're ever uncertain about something being controversial, please send it to WP:AfD, or tag it first for notability concerns, or at least look into any other options as WP:ATD. Bearian (talk) 02:43, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have de-PRODed this as I was able to find multiple reliable sources on Nakkar upon a cursory search. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a WP:BLP, so it can be deleted if it doesn't have three good sources. Bearian (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian I went ahead and condensed all your messages about the PRODs into one section, thanks for leaving me these messages. I will respond to each one to the best of my ability:

• I checked the Egyptian Arabic version of François David prior to the PROD and can confirm it does not have reliable sourcing. The first three citations are duplicates of the one citation on the English version [1], while these three don't say anything about the subject at all [2] [3] [4]. This page links to the first citation [5], but I'll wait until you respond with your source search.
• Matthew Nakkar has been tagged with Template:More citations needed for 12 years; it looks like the kind of article that could have reliable sourcing but I did a search and only found two or three. Not enough to warrant notability.
• I remember doing an in-depth search for Mar Iskhaq Yosip yesterday and didn't find much, but maybe I missed something. I'll have to sit on the fence with this one.

Happy to discuss these articles and the process of PROD'ing more with you; I want to go over articles in the assessment of WikiProject Assyria to see any that can be put for deletion if they're not notable enough for an article, which would help my future editing in the topic area. Surayeproject3 (talk) 03:36, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Again, I'm just being cautious in light of recent Wikipedia controversies. If you want to take François David, can you please wait a day or two? Then I'll be satisfied that we have given the Assyrian and Catholic Projects sufficient notice so that nobody can accuse us of being anti-Christian. Bearian (talk) 03:39, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm not opposed to that idea; I will probably wait until Tuesday to take it to AfD, I'll respond and tag you with the link when I do. Surayeproject3 (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Bearian (talk) 16:49, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al Salamu Alaykum, my name is Wally, and I work for AUIB. I’ve written a comprehensive update with more references and would be grateful if you could kindly review it.

User:WallyWicket/sandbox

Thank you in advance! WallyWicket (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Launchballer 00:03, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Defense of Azakh is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 13:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Defense of Azakh has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 13:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bet-Nahrain Democratic Party is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bet-Nahrain Democratic Party has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 23:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Defense of Azakh has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 5, 7 November 2025

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Assyrians in Armenia is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Defence of Iwardo has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 6, 21 November 2025

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! How are you? I stepped away from our joint effort and Wikipedia in general for a while. How are things going in order to get to GA? I starting to edit again and wondered if you were still interested in finishing our original goal. I would love to help. Cheers, CF-501 (talk · contribs) 01:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @CF-501 Falcon, hope you've been well and glad to see you back on Wiki. I had opened a peer review for Syriac Orthodox Church as you remember, but it hadn't received any replies for 3 months and by that time I was working on other articles (some of which were DYK and GA noms). Someone recently finally responded, and another editor copy-edited the article after this conversation [6], but I've been a bit busy IRL to address it. I am still interested in getting it to GA status though.

If you're able to soon, addressing the points at the peer review and then notifying the reviewer would be greatly helpful. I'll try to join back in with editing when I can, provided real life concerns as well as other on-Wiki GANs I have at the moment. Surayeproject3 (talk) 03:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great to hear that you are still working on it. I will try my best to help wherever I can. See you around! Cheers, CF-501 (talk · contribs) 12:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 7, 5 December 2025

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bet-Nahrain Democratic Party has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LEvalyn -- LEvalyn (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Assyrians in Armenia has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 8, 19 December 2025

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 9, 2 January 2026

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Surayeproject3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Human rights violations against Assyrians by Iraqi Kurdistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article David Barsum Perley is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 00:44, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article David Barsum Perley has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 10, 18 January 2026

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:28, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]