Hello, I'm Sink Cat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Vivian Dsena without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Unexplained reference removal — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 07:24, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want add career details like where he started from can you help me in that Smchni (talk) 10:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Vivian Dsena, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Garuda ^Talk! 13:04, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How to add career details Smchni (talk) 14:50, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vivian Dsena, you may be blocked from editing. Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:06, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Vivian Dsena. Anerdw (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bored kittycat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bored kittycat (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Vivian Dsena. Ravensfire (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Dimpskh per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dimpskh. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 21:20, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]