Archives

2025, 2026

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 5 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

Murgatroyd49 you seem to have a personal vendetta against my website. Take the time to look at the website and you will see it is not for my personal promotion but for the benefit of the Stanley villagers. D25jimdee (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's not personal I am just adhering to the principal of avoiding self-promotion. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For Murgatroyd49. It's not self promotion and if you can't see that then perhaps you could run it past another moderator who may have a more balanced view. Have you actually looked at the website? D25jimdee (talk) 20:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) First, I’d advise not repeatedly creating new sections - this is the third discussion you’ve opened on the exact same topic on Murgatroyd’s talk page.

You’ve opened a discussion on the article talk page - that’s the correct place to discuss this, instead of dragging it out here. In the article talk, other editors can contribute, whereas here it’s just a one-to-one with the editor you know disagrees with you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I'm doing anything wrong but this system is unfamiliar to me. If you can advise me how to get anyone else to look at this issue I'd appreciate it. D25jimdee (talk) 20:23, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. I’m not being facetious, but Wikipedia is a community of volunteers, so it can take some time. If nothing happens in a week or so, another option might be WP:Third opinion. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Danners430: It's actually the fifth. See Special:Contributions/D25jimdee and count the times that "User talk:Murgatroyd49 →Stanley Perthshire: new section" occurs. Once I have saved this edit, there will be three sections on this page titled "Stanley Perthshire"; and (including this edit that I'm making right now) I have twice removed a heading merging one section into the previous. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I understand new users are a thing, and we all start somewhere… but face, meet palm… Danners430 _{tweaks made} 23:57, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't AEC Regent III and AEC Regent III RT be directly regarded as Predecessor or Successor relationships? Houtyuhn (talk) 15:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Because they are contempories, the RT is merely a variant of the RIII Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just checked, the AEC Regent III RT was actually released earlier than the AEC Regent III. Houtyuhn (talk) 15:26, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]