The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 03:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

• ... that Raymond and Mildred Kramer hired William Lescaze to design a house for them after walking past Lescaze's own house? Source: Bonanos, Christopher (January 5, 2021). "Why Hasn't Anyone Bought This William Lescaze House?". Curbed.
  • ALT1: ... that the Raymond C. and Mildred Kramer House was one of fewer than a half-dozen houses built in Manhattan during 1934? Source: Work is Started on Modern House: Four-story Residence Being Built for R. Kramer in East 74th Street". The New York Times. August 26, 1934. p. RE1.
  • ALT2: ... that the rear facade of the Raymond C. and Mildred Kramer House was described as "undulat[ing] like a Gaudi-sculpted tsunami"? Source: Malle, Chloe (May 12, 2010). "$14 M. Townhouse Listing Begs: Is Lescaze Worth It?". Observer.
  • ALT3: ... that the Raymond C. and Mildred Kramer House was one of three buildings that William Lescaze designed in Manhattan? Source: Bonanos, Christopher (January 5, 2021). "Why Hasn't Anyone Bought This William Lescaze House?". Curbed.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Danielle Sassoon
  • Comment: I will also try to take an image of this house by the end of the week.

Epicgenius (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks all good, approved under good faith for ALT1 as an offline source. I'm giving this the full green(or silver) light since Epic mentioned off-wiki that he wouldn't be able to take a photo for this for a good while, so we're running without. As for the hooks, I'd say 2, 1, 0 and then 3 in order of interestingness to me. --PixDeVl (T | C | G) 00:06, 6 March 2025 (UTC)