Talk:Sidney Gish
| Sidney Gish has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 13, 2025. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Sidney Gish (pictured) has described her composition process as "Frankensteining"? | ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sidney Gish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk · contribs) 05:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 23:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I will review this article. I should have comments up within the next few days. -Riley1012 (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Vigilantcosmicpenguin: I have finished my review below! -Riley1012 (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Riley1012: Addressed everything. Thanks! — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the changes. I will pass this! -Riley1012 (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Riley1012: Addressed everything. Thanks! — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
- She was in the college's female a capella group... This should either be a cappella or acapella.
- The album received coverage in local publications including Allston Pudding and DigBoston. Add a comma before "including"
- To make the tables accessible (MOS:DTAB), could you add ! scope="col" | and ! scope="row" | to the tables in the "Discography" and "Awards and nominations" sections?
- These three changes made. Thanks for making me aware of the table guideline. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
2. Verifiable
The article uses reliable sources and separates the primary sources. It passes Earwig's check for obvious copyright violations. Here is my spot check: 1, 4, 7, 8, 16, 22, 29– all good.
- Can you add a retrieval date on sources 1 and 6 and on the first two "Posts by Sidney Gish" sources?
- Also on the "Posts by Sidney Gish" source 2, add the account information to show this was posted from Sidney Gish's account (using Template:Cite Instagram might be easier than Cite web).
- Done.
- Before her music career, she attempted to go viral on Tumblr. She went viral in 2016 for her doodles that her mother embroidered, which were covered in Buzzfeed News. Can you move the inline citation to source 2 to after the first sentence (her stating she was intentionally trying to go viral) and keep the citation to source 4 where it is (this source specifically mentions the Buzzfeed News article).
- Done (though both sources mention Buzzfeed so kept both on that sentence).
- It received a 7.7 rating on Pitchfork and a positive review by The Fader. Move the inline citations here to the end of the sentence.
- Not done, the citation should be in the middle of the sentence as it does not verify that there was a positive review by The Fader. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
3. Broad
The article is short, but this is a relatively new artist, and the article covers the major aspects of her career so far without unnecessary detail.
4. Neutral
- WBUR-FM described her songs as "mundane (or obscure) meanderings peppered by puns and brief, dazzling extrapolations". Add the name of the author (Amelia Mason) for proper attribution of the quotes (as done in the previous two sentences).
- Done.
5. Stable
I have looked through the talk page and edit history and do not see any ongoing content disputes.
6. Illustrated
The two images used are tagged with their copyright statuses and are relevant.
- Add a caption to the image used in the infobox (something as simple as "Gish performing in 2019" would suffice)
- Done
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by TarnishedPath talk 07:23, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- ... that Sidney Gish (pictured) has perfect pitch?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dorothy Sproule
- Comment: Driveby nom.
Launchballer 02:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC).
- I literally just edit conflicted with you while reviewing a DYK hook... and then edit conflicted again to create this nomination. What are the odds? Anyway, I was actually about to suggest this hook:
- ALT1: ... that Sidney Gish (pictured) started an internship that involved finding new musicians, the same week that Spotify featured her as a new musician?
- — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 03:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I beg your pardon. I was looking through Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green/Meetup/9 for stuff to nominate.--Launchballer 03:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, just thought it was a fun coincidence. I had also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Angus Watt (financial advisor) with the intent of using it as the QPQ for this nom. If you want, I can count this as the QPQ so you can save your QPQ for something else. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 04:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- I do my own, but thanks for the offer.--Launchballer 22:23, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, just thought it was a fun coincidence. I had also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Angus Watt (financial advisor) with the intent of using it as the QPQ for this nom. If you want, I can count this as the QPQ so you can save your QPQ for something else. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 04:19, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
The article is new enough (promoted to GA on 6 October 2025), is long enough (5562 characters), has no copyright problems (per GA review), and is presentable (per GA review and readthrough). The hook is cited in the article, short enough, and interesting. However in the article in The Boston Globe, it says "Like those influences, Gish is a polymath, having added piano, ukulele, and guitar to a skillset that also boasts what’s called 'perfect pitch,' the ability to recognize and recreate musical notes without reference tones (though she stresses she’s not always completely correct)." So does she really have perfect pitch? Reading the article, I thought that the "Frankensteining" might be used in a hook, but it would have to be done in a manner that doesn't direct people to another article. Both images appear to be properly licensed and are used in the article, I would prefer a photo which shows her eyes, but I think the first one is clearer at a smaller size, so I prefer it. – Editør (talk) 09:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Sidney Gish (pictured) has described her composition process as "Frankensteining"? ALT1 is also an option.--Launchballer 13:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think ALT1 doesn't work, because the two elements that are combined may have happened around the same time but otherwise they seem unrelated. I think ALT2 is interesting and it is cited in the article. I think the process of Frankensteining could be better explained in the article though.
I hereby pass ALT2 with the first image. The image could be slightly cropped. The words "singer-songwriter" might be added to the hook. – Editør (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Personally, I think ALT1 is more interesting. I disagree with your statement that these events were "unrelated", as multiple sources mention the two events coinciding (the coincidence itself is what's interesting). But I also approve of ALT2. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 17:50, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Sidney Gish (pictured) has described her composition process as "Frankensteining"? ALT1 is also an option.--Launchballer 13:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
