Talk:Kasey Peters

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 33 external links on Kasey Peters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kasey Peters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kasey Peters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kasey Peters/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 08:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Robert McClenon (talk · contribs) 03:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life

Can the Personal Life section be updated? It refers to 2021. 03:18, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

No, that's the most recent source. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will request a second opinion as to whether a Good Article status is appropriate for a living person for whom there has been no new information in the past four years. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. That's not that long ago though. He's retired from playing football. Are you expecting a new article about him every year? ("This Just In: Kasey Peters is still living in Mexico") Regardless, the text says "As of 2021". It doesn't say "currently", even though all of that stuff still appears to be true based off a look at his instagram page. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2nd opinion wasn't tagged correctly on the talk page. I fixed it. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I am placing this article on hold because it doesn't have any photographs of the subject, but they can probably be added within a few days. I expect that I will be able to pass the article after media are added. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:30, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there are any free images. I've searched Google Images, Flickr, and Youtube but nothing has the right license. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Second Opinion Questions

I would like the advice of a more experienced Good Article reviewer on two points. First, the article has no information about the personal life of the subject in the past four years. Is that consistent with a Good Article? Second, it appears that there are no available free images of the subject. Is that consistent with a Good Article? Robert McClenon (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting questions, but I think both of these are fine, Robert McClenon. The GA criteria only require that if media with acceptable copyright status is appropriate and readily available, then such media should be provided, and that the article covers all relevant aspects of the topic. If there is no new relevant information, then there's nothing else to include. This happens fairly often after BLPs retire. Eddie891 Talk Work 10:52, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pass

My questions have been answered and this article satisfies the Good Article criteria/ Robert McClenon (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kasey_Peters