Talk:KWHY

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KBEH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. Well done Sammi Brie. Cos (X + Z) 16:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:KWHY/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 19:25, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 16:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Stable?

Yes. Cos (X + Z) 16:16, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image Review

  • is there an image of the current logo?

Copyright is good. Cos (X + Z) 22:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CosXZ Found one and a website for the main 63.1 channel. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

  • The permit was assigned to a non-profit organization controlled by Yoakem, Limitless Learning, in 1976;[5] the group did apply for a HEW grant in 1978.[6] --> The permit was assigned to a non-profit organization controlled by Yoakem, Limitless Learning, in 1976.[5] The group applied for a HEW grant in 1978.[6]
  • Donnelley—grandson of Reuben H. Donnelley, inventor of the yellow pages—brought in new investors, including Beverly Hills accountant and real estate broker Don Sterling (no relation to the former Los Angeles Clippers owner of the same name), and built studios on Maulhardt Road in Oxnard. --> Thorne Donnelley Jr.—grandson of Reuben H. Donnelley, inventor of the yellow pages—brought in new investors, including Beverly Hills accountant and real estate broker Donald Sterling (no relation to the former Los Angeles Clippers owner of the same name), and built sales offices and studios on 663 Maulhardt Avenue in Oxnard.
  • The acquisition was made through Riklis's PZ Broadcasting. --> The acquisition was made through Riklis's PZ Entertainment.
  • link Santa Barbara and Thousand Oaks

Sources

Earwig shows a 2% which is good. Cos (X + Z) 19:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • OR issue with [7][8]
    • [7] is buried in a footnote on PDF page 8, page 743. It is the big blockquote which is prefaced "In Mekaoy Co...." citing the document that apparently was the FCC deleting the permit in 1980. I cannot find this document anywhere, unfortunately, because it was published not in the main FCC Record. Mekaoy Co. is mentioned in some decisions about extensions for unbuilt TV stations and has a citation of 48 R.R. 2d 815 (B'cast Bur. 1980) referring to Radio Regulation 2nd Series. This appears to be very difficult to obtain and may only be digitized in a specialty academic database I do not have.
    • [8] is not OR, as the source states "CP reinstated 2-22-82". PDF page 1095 but book page 1079.
  • replace [22] with this
    • When a multipage newspaper clipping is cited, I will always include it in its entirety, so this will not be changed (even if the content being cited is in the second page of the article). @CosXZ: See comments in re: the OR tags, which I've removed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 20:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the explanation. Cos (X + Z) 01:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • [33] has wrong url
    • Wow, thanks for catching.
  • link publisher when possible
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif talk 03:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 761 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Earwig only complains about some stuff covered by WP:LIMITED. Plagiarism spot checks as of Special:Permalink/1288286502: ref 5 is clear; ref 12 is clear; ref 26 doesn't mention Riklis, but not everything requires an inline citation and it supports the second half of the sentence without copyvio (I really hope that Riklis realized how much he lived up to his name); 39 is clear; 49 is clear. Great work :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:KWHY