Talk:Call It What You Want (Taylor Swift song)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Call It What You Want (Taylor Swift song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 07:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 21:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I got this. One of Swift's better songs :-) – zmbro (talk) (cont) 21:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

  • Copyvio detector looks good at 32%. It mostly caught the song title and song lyrics so we're good there. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sourcing looks great!
  • Is there an image of Swift and/or Jack we could add? Maybe her performing on the Reputation tour?
  • Wasn't this song about her relationship with Joe Alwyn? Did she ever confirm that or am I misremembering things? It seems the use of British English could hint at that...
  • Write out "United Kingdom" and "United States" in their first instances
  • "Its balladic production is subdued and airy, resulting in a contemplative listening experience" should this be attributed? It reads rather fact-y
  • "writing that it successfully captured the "vibrant spirit" of Reputation after the mixed results of the preceding tracks like "Look What You Made Me Do" and "Gorgeous".[33] Multiple reviews considered "Call It What You Want" a significant improvement over the preceding Reputation tracks." should this be reworded to mean singles? I interpreted this as meaning the preceding album tracks but I don't think that's what you mean here.
  • Has there been any retrospective commentary? I see the album article has that. Also, could we include where this song is in Rob Sheffield's latest list ranking every Swift song? I know you've included that in other song articles.

The rest looks solid! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! I have addressed your points accordingly :) Ippantekina (talk) 10:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome! You do great work as always. Happy to  Passzmbro (talk) (cont) 14:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.