This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Arizona. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Arizona|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Arizona. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:| watch |
Arizona
- Hayden Moss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The previous nomination lacked responses and was closed as "no consensus". On the other hand, an AFD nomination on another article was closed as "redirected" even after lack of third-party responses.
Since the last nomination, I've yet to see any recent reliable sources verifying this person's general notability (or basic notability either). Even if he's "notable" generally, I'm unconvinced that his "notability" guarantees a longstanding article that warrants inclusion.
That's not to say that the article quality itself determines his notability. Neither is assumption of his notability being "temporary" or assumption that significant coverage about him has been less sustainable.
Well, he might have gained some traction as the first Big Brother winner/alumni to appear on Survivor and as a then-boyfriend of a Survivor veteran in Survivor: Blood vs. Water. However, I'm unconvinced that he has sufficient amount of major roles or has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions
to meet WP:ENT. Other than his own personal life, I couldn't find him making an impact elsewhere outside those reality TV appearances.
To apply WP:BIO1E or WP:BLP1E... or WP:PAGEDECIDE, I'll re-propose that the article be redirected to Big Brother 12 (American season), his winning season. Besides my preferred suggestion... and default one if no one else comments here, I can accept anyone else's suggestions that the page be redirected to Survivor: Blood vs. Water... or deleted. George Ho (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2025 (UTC); edited, 19:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, and Arizona. George Ho (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Big Brother 12 (American season) per nom. Sources are very scanty outside routine coverage related to the TV shows on which he appeared. Astaire (talk) 17:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- Juan Xavier House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Mr. Xavier's home does not inherit notability from him. I have been able to find no source that discusses Mr. Xavier or his home other than in passing mention. Please see Talk:Juan Xavier House Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 4. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 12:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- KTFL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable TV station that was only on air for 5-6 years. No sources. Was kept under previous looser notability standards. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Arizona. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: This is definitely a remnant of the far lower inclusion standards in this topic area of 2006 — and that conclusion might apply as much (if not more) to the first nomination itself as it does to the actual article. (I probably should also note that the first nomination, which came very quickly after the article was created, came two months after the eventual final sign-off but a month or so before the license was canceled; there was an assumption that the station was merely converting to digital, but that turned out to be the type of peering into the crystal ball that Wikipedia does not do.) About the only truly-P&G based rationale given by anyone in that discussion (at least by 2025 standards) was by the then-nominator (since a 2021 RfC, we no longer assume automatic notability for licensed stations even in the absence of significant coverage). Normally I'd call for a redirect to List of television stations in Arizona#Defunct full-power stations where KTFL is listed (and happens to mention all that can, or even needs to be, said about this station), but the call sign has been reassigned to a new station in Washington state owned by Spokane Public Radio, which if their station list is any indication relays KSFC. That may merit a redirect in that direction that does not require retaining the Arizona station article's page history. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- It never got a single writeup in the Arizona Daily Sun. That's a bad sign. Delete and recreate as a redirect to KSFC, as the Kettle Falls WA facility is now in service. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: Just to very much clear, yes, I'm gonna say Delete, but just because a station in Washington State could've (or did) mentioned the KTFL, doesn't mean we should transport it to ... that article. In fact the List of television stations in Arizona#Defunct full-power stations would work more than a mention in a article for Spokane Public Radio. (Just saying, the reasoning doesn't kinda work on me.) mer764KC / Cospaw⛲️ (He/Him | 💬Talk! • 📦Contributions) 23:22, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.