The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subrat Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither the article itself nor its two references demonstrate that the subject is notable. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - passes WP:NCRICKET for umpiring the Ranji Trophy match (explicitly stated at WP:CRIN). Quasar G ^{t - c} 22:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep - clearly passes WP:NCRICKET which suggests that WP:BEFORE has not been followed. StAnselm (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – as per my !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjeev Dua, I believe that despite the guidance at WP:NCRICKET, this is a run of the mill domestic umpire without any notability, and that they fail to meet the WP:GNG. Harrias ^talk 14:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep After Ianblair23's good work on this, I'm now happy it meets the criteria. Harrias ^talk 13:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – I have expanded the article. He has actually stood in four women's international matches. This should now pass WP:GNG. – Ianblair23 (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.