Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() |
---|
27 February 2025 |
|
Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
---|
Cleanup |
Categories |
|
Create an article |
Referencing |
Stubs |
Deletion |
Polishing |
Translation into English |
Images |
Controversy |
To-do lists |
Disambiguation |
More |
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
The world was created for all.
No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
— SafariScribe
If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn't be "d", so it's a mistake; fix it yourself), please don't come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it's thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.
A month ago we talked about an article I wrote. I am a paid contributor. I'm trying to follow all the guidelines and you helped me with that. I added some part to make it more impartial, talking about criticism. This article has already been previously approved by @Qcne. Can you check and see if you can exit drafts again?

The article Sex, Love, Misery: New New York has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, see Talk page
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Intent
Hi, SafariScribe.
Could you please clarify what the intended purpose of this message that you left on my talk-page in relation to my positions a the AfDs was?
You have been blocked before and you wouldn't want that to repeat itself. To help others and yourself, please add "withdraw" to the AFD pages that you nominated.
Specially, I would like to know what you are hoping my reaction to this message will be?𝔓420°𝔓Holla 09:48, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Lion's Share
Hello, SafariScribe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Lion's Share, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Request on 16:28:13, 23 February 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Simonmatz
- Simonmatz (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Marek Orko Vacha and Jan Graubner Controversy ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Article deletion - not a news report per se
Hi there. Thank you for a speedy review! I understand your reason for not approving this article. However, allow me to give some comment.
This may indeed seem like a news report indeed, but one should understand the context of the event. This is not just a report of a single event, but an explanation of a chain of events taking place over a week. In Czech Republic, it is currently a great subject of debate that resonates with many people, both believers and non-believers. It will surely be remembered as a case of conflict in the Prague Diocese, as well as the Catholic church affairs in Czech Republic. The reasons, I think, that such an article has it's place on Wikipedia are the following:
- May be searched in future as a historic case of church affairs in Czech Rep. Note that the "controversy" is over, as the two main actors have reached a reconciliation of their differences.
- Many of my foreign friends, all of whom speak English, have shown interest in learning about the event. This was the reason I've created this article.
Allow me to kindly ask for reconsideration based on the comments provided.
Kind regards, Simon
Simonmatz (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Actually the writing seems like a reported event and it doesn't meet WP:NEVENT. I would like to ask if you are trying to create an article about the priest? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:41, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2025)
Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Family cookbooks • Peninsula Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Undoing rejection on Draft:Lucinda Nicholas
Hia @SafariScribe, I undid your rejection on Draft:Lucinda Nicholas as I felt it was a bit premature. The author came into the IRC live chat looking for some help. qcne (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Request on 19:47:28, 25 February 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by User6847
Hello,
I hope you are doing well. I noticed that my draft was declined, and I wanted to reach out for guidance. Would you be able to assist me or provide any tips on how I can improve it for publication? I would greatly appreciate any feedback or discussion on how to move forward.
Thank you for your time and support.
Best regards, Kayla
User6847 (talk) 19:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. While I appreciate your writing, the draft currently doesn't meet WP:NPOL, one of our notability guideline. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Request on 23:26:39, 25 February 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Mlsatori
- Mlsatori (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Grotto. An Opera in Two Acts ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
What is it exactly that you find unqualified about the submission I made. Because I used multiple verifiable sources and I thought there was more than enough information available for it. An I would like to know what is it exactly that I need to change on the page for me to be able to go ahead with that. Thanks.
Mlsatori (talk) 23:26, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sources like OperaWire and Timeout México are unreliable. Read about sources at WP:RS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Request to Re-evaluate Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth's Notability
I am writing regarding the recent decline of the Draft:Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth AFC submission and respectfully request a re-evaluation, as I believe it meets WP:NORG criteria. The Peeth holds significant national recognition, with media coverage in Times of India, Indian Express, Amar Ujala, and Deccan Herald, along with a historical and cultural impact. Additionally, its leader has been honored with the Padma Shri, and government records further validate its prominence. Given these verifiable references and the organization's notable influence, I believe a reconsideration is warranted. MH-wiki2025 (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hi,
What you believe doesn't mean it should influence what you write on Wikipedia. The notability guideline which your draft didn't meet is WP:NORG. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Request on 16:22:18, 26 February 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by 71.33.146.62
- 71.33.146.62 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Nutrient, Inc. ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Hello!
Thank you for reviewing our submission. I'd like to seek clarification on the last time I submitted, which was after the first submission was rejected with an accompanying explanation that we weren't using good links. I updated the links accordingly and resubmitted, and that second submission was rejected without additional explanation.
Might I ask if the updated links are still not up to par, and for any other suggestions you might have to make the article worthy of submission? Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nutrient,_Inc.
Thank you again, and I'm open to all feedback.
71.33.146.62 (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Your suggestion to move Draft:Dolomitic failure in South Africa
I think, I need your help. But first, thanks for your suggestion to move Draft:Dolomitic failure in South Africa into Dolomite (rock), to which I agree because it was out intention. Now, User:Mikenorton reverted my addition, as (s)he considers that section too long or irrelevant for the Lemma Dolomite (rock). I already started a discussion with this User, but no reply so far. Taking into consideration that African Lemmas, and you know that better than anyone else, I assume, could we please create an own entry for Dolomitic failure in South Africa and direct from Dolomite(rock) to there? This might cause less trouble. If yes, would you mind doing so, as you have admin rights, which I don’t. This I would highly appreciate! – C.wolke (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Done. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I think, that was a misunderstanding. I did not mean a redirect, but in a new Lemma “Dolomitic failure in South Africa” based on the draft I had. As I said, User:Mikenorton considered it too long for the inclusion into Dolomite (rock), therefore I think, it requires the Lemma “Dolomitic failure in South Africa”. Do you think, you can do that? Unfortunately, I don’t know where the initial draft “Dolomitic failure in South Africa” is now – but you might, I am sure. Thanks! ~~~~ C.wolke (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Follow That Goblin! draft article
Hey, SafariScribe, if you have the time now, later, or some time, go to the Follow That Goblin! draft article. I could use a little assistance with this:
Further reading
Bowker, R. R. (1999) Bowker's Directory of Videocassettes for Children 1999, Bowker, R. R. Bowker.
Thomson/Gale (2008) Video Source Book 39th Edition, Thomson/Gale, Thomson/Gale.
Willis, Donald C. (1997) Horror and Science Fiction Films IV, Willis, Scarecrow Press.
Jones, Stephen (2000) The Essential Monster Movie Guide: A Century of Creature Features on Film, TV, and Video, Jones, Billboard Books.
University Press of America (1998) The Hebrew Israelite Community, University Press of America, University Press of America.
Gopen, Stuart (1993) Gopen's Guide to Closed Captioned Video, Stuart Gopen, Caption Database Incorporated
Bowker, R. R. (1996) Bowker's Complete Video Directory Volumes 1-4, Bowker, R. R. Bowker.
Sharp, John, Macklin, Colleen (2024) Iterate Ten Lessons in Design and Failure, MIT Press, John Sharp, Colleen Macklin
Standard Rate & Data Service (2004) SRDS Tv & Cable Source Volume 86, Issue 3, Standard Rate & Data Service, Standard Rate & Data Service
Atkinson, Doug, Zippan, Fiona, (1995) Videos for Kids The Essential, Indispensable Parent's Guide to Children's Movies on Video, Prima Pub., Doug Atkinson, Fiona Zippan
Nielsen Business Media, Inc., (1993) Billboard Mar 6, 1993 Vol. 105, No. 10, Nielsen Business Media, Inc., Nielsen Business Media, Inc.
{{cite book}}
: Empty citation (help): |author1= has generic name (help)
References 2.^a b c d e f Cite error: The named reference "daniel diker" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
8.^ "Follow That Goblin!" Scopus Films. {{cite web}}
: Empty citation (help): Check |url= value (help)
67.^ Nielsen Business Media, Inc., (March 6, 1993) Billboard Mar 6, 1993 Vol. 105, No. 10, Nielsen Business Media, Inc., p. 72. ISSN 0006-2510. {{cite book}}
: Empty citation (help): |author1= has generic name (help) 2601:401:4300:3720:DE9B:7927:A762:2D87 (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- @2601:401:4300:3720:DE9B:7927:A762:2D87,
Done. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Good afternoon, I hope you are doing well. I'm just dropping by to see if you are still in the process of reviewing the above mentioned draft. I noticed it has been marked as under review since February 5, 2025. Best, Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Done reviewing. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:03, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
"Xbs" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Xbs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 1 § Xbs until a consensus is reached. Justjourney (talk) 03:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2024 Annual Report
Guild of Copy Editors Annual Report
Our 2024 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2025)
Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Jewish deli • Family cookbooks Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Les Borsai submission
Regarding Draft:Les Borsai
Hello. I have changed the language and reduced puffery. Please have a look at the same. Scenecontra (talk) 13:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @SafariScribe I know that the queue is long, but I have made changes to the language and added links from Fortune, Yahoo! Finance etc. Scenecontra (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Draft issues
I just wanted to make sure you don't have a problem with me? My last three BLP draft submissions have been denied within hours of submission all by you. As an Afc submission reviewer myself I like to think I am familiar with BLP notability. I want to assume good faith but I would also appreciate some understanding for how the same reviewer denies all my articles within hours of submission when the approximate wait time is three months? You must have a tracker or something to at least see when I create an article? Or are you just denying basically every new BLP submission you see and you doing hundreds of these a day? Czarking0 (talk) 04:34, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Czarking0, I am sorry if you think I intentionally decline your drafts. No, I have no personal issues with anybody including you. I am in the mass but will show my analysis after that. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, you've moved the draft. That's fine. I need not to explain. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have not moved Draft: Chen Tonghai which is what sparked my comment Czarking0 (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, you've moved the draft. That's fine. I need not to explain. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
About the Holy Week in Segovia draft
Good evening, first of all, I would like to remark that I'm not that familiar with the english Wikipedia, I've done a couple of translations and some sections in individual articles, but I've never created an article before, so I wanted to be very careful in making the best possible article. I would like to explain why I think that the sources are verifiable. First, acording to WP:NONENG, sources that are not in english are allowed as long as there aren't other sources in english, and in the case of the Semana Santa of Segovia, I couldn't find any reliable sources in english, so that should not be a problem.
The next source "Semana Santa en Segovia" by María Mercedes Sanz has been published by an independent library, while the writer is a teacher of Art History in the University of Valladolid and was a councillor of the Segovia City Council in the areas of Culture, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, so she should also be a veriable source.
And finally, I use the website https://www.semanasantasegovia.com/ as a source for the information regarding the brotherhoods and information about them such as their year of fundation or the author of the sculptures they own. The website is supported and backed up by the Regional Goverment of Castile and León, as well as the city council of Segovia and the provincial deputation, as seen at the bottom of the website. This should make it a verifiable source, as it is backed up by the official goverment of the region and is cited to talk about data that could not be manipulated or distorted in order to favour the brotherhoods.
I would really appreciate if you could point out the mistakes I could have made in choosing the sources and tell me how I could improve the draft in order for it to be accepted.
Thank you Mateo MD (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 13:05, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
This seems like the least logical thing to remove from the main article, as it is the main description of her life. It is also strangely titled as it covers her whole career, not just the "early" career. If the article needs to be split, it makes more sense to e.g. separate articles about her political and social views. Fram (talk) 13:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Fram, I understand your point, but I think the article needs a split as well. During the FAC, some sections, such as the family story, aren't essential to the main article even though they are important for the sake of the Encyclopedia. While I never expected immediate nomination, I recognize that the article is still developing. Deleting it would result in lost of vital informations, which is why I suggest spinning off the extraneous content into a separate article, hence my opposition to the CSD. The split- which is still ongoing- would help streamline the main article while preserving important details about her life. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie for deletion

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early life and career of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Fram (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for moving TonewoodAmp from AfC to the article space. In the edit summary I note that you removed the article short description and the infoboxes that I provided. It is my understanding that some components are critical for WikiData to pickup name/value properties (such as Official website (which I manually added to Wikidata). Would you be against adding the infoboxes back into the article? I am COI on the article and making an edit request to restore the infobox would be reverting your edit -- complicating matters.
Thank you Apriltools (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 7 March 2025 (UTC)