Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: HerakliosJulianus (talk · contribs) 16:14, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 02:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Hi, I hope your nomination will succeed. Failing an article is always a failure for the reviewer as well. My comments are suggestions, feel free to reject any of them, but in this case please inform me about your concerns. Borsoka (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

• File:MongolEmpireDivisions1300.png: the summary at Commons says that it is "Partially based on Atlas of World History". Which source verifies the deviation from the cited work? The author(s), year of publication, publisher and ISBN of Atlas of World history should be added.
• File:Abaqa Khan.jpg: US PD tag (at Commons) and "alt text" (in the article) are needed.
• File:DiezAlbumsArmedRiders I.jpg: US PD tag and "alt text" are needed; could the source be more specific?
• File:Mongol soldiers by Rashid al-Din 1305.JPG: US PD tag and "alt text" are needed.
• I would delete at least two pictures. Borsoka (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, Heraklios 13:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

• Academic sources of high standard are cited.
• Please follow ABC order when listing the sources. Borsoka (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, Heraklios 12:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]