The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jada boston new 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image looks like an advertisement or a posed, professional shot. Unlikely that the uploader holds the rights. Leo 00:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Illusion Island Dizzy Screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screenshot of copyrighted work. Doesn't look like the uploader is the actual copyright holder. Eeekster (talk) 00:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eekster has stated as the reason for flagging this image that she/he doesn't believe I own the copyright for it. I wrote the game in it's entirety, so can assure you that I own the copyright for it, and am obviously therefore free to take screenshots of it. I do realise that anyone could say this, however if you visit my website at www.dizzystories.co.uk, you'll see the game available there, along with others. You can also email me using the email on there, and I will verify that I am the owner, and am free to upload a screenshot here. Thanks! Peakhiker (talk) 21:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply Peahiker, nothing on the website shows that the images have been release as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License as it clearly states All rights reserved. You can either change your website to clearly show the image with an appropriate release which is normally the easiest way, or follow the procedure at Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials#Granting_us_permission_to_copy_material_already_online. MilborneOne (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MilborneOne, I'll get something up on the site about Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License within a day or two, and edit this post when I have done. Peakhiker (talk) 22:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now attached the relevant Creative Commons License to my website, authorising use of the games (plus images etc of those games) in accordance with the license. As this has now been done, and is checkable (www.dizzystories.co.uk), I will re-upload the file as soon as you acknowledge that I am ok to do so. Thanks! Peakhiker (talk) 23:22, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harrypotterandthedeathlyhallowspart1cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• At best this is a derivative work with trademark issues. Eeekster (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Begumjahanarashahnwaz.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: this 1990 [1] postage stamp is falsely licenced by the uploader as public domain but is still copyright per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Pakistan. Fair-use does not allow the use of stamps in biographies per WP:NFC#Images and without any critical commentary about the stamp itself fails it also WP:NFCC#8. ww2censor (talk) 16:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually the image is tagged 'both as non-free and as public domain but it is clearly unfree so is a copyright violation and/or fails WP:NFCC. Either way it needs to be deleted. ww2censor (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Heaton Of Cardiff City.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not free use; original appears here Mattythewhite (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.