Archive 1

Hello, my previous account was User:Renamed user 1oj3saabam. I had previously had it deleted per WP:RTV, but formally decided to come back to Wikipedia. Seefooddiet (talk) 07:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Also, I used these two IPs previously: 104.232.119.107 and 211.43.120.242 (while vacationing in Korea). Both IPs I readily and often disclosed who I was. From this point on I'll be editing only with this account. seefooddiet (talk) 18:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

I apologize for reverting you at Utoro, Uji. Didn't realize until just shortly ago that it was you. I wrongly concluded from the all caps on the template and the unfamiliar editor name that it was a new user making a test edit of some kind. I'm very, very sorry! —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

It's ok, no worries! More on me for having a different username seefooddiet (talk) 02:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Glad to see you back here.

Queen of Hearts ^talk 00:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

(and another good food pun!) Queen of Hearts ^talk 01:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hey, thank you 🙂 I actually really badly wanted to use "grapesurgeon" but that name was taken 😭 seefooddiet (talk) 01:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Glad to see you're on an actual account again, look forward to seeing more new articles on Korean topics. ⁂CountHacker (talk) 23:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks 🙂 more to come! seefooddiet (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

i noticed that you made recent changes to the dodgeball page removing the main image. Please revert this as it is causing confusion. Thatdodgeballguy (talk) 04:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

? Could you explain the confusion it is causing? I'm not seeing any posts on the talk page for that article about the image. seefooddiet (talk) 04:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

That is one of the most well known players in the sport of dodgeball. The point is to help grow the sport. There was no need for it to be changed in the first place. Thatdodgeballguy (talk) 04:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

It would be greatly appreciated Thatdodgeballguy (talk) 04:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Responded on Talk:Dodgeball seefooddiet (talk) 04:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

That was referenced in many places across the web and would be greatly appreciated for reversion. There was no reason to change it in the first place. Thatdodgeballguy (talk) 04:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Please keep comments in one place; let's talk on the dodgeball talk page seefooddiet (talk) 05:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:ONUS, it would be up to YOU to start the discussion on the talk page. Also be aware that BLPs are a contentious topic. I am not sure you meant the tone but it did not sound WP:CIVIL when I read it. CNMall41 (talk) 07:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Prior to threatening to escalate to RfC without discussion, you may also may want to review the talk page history where the source you used was already stated not to be reliable for inclusion. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I meant that you should post on the talk page of the respective article, not on my talk page. Nobody can see this conversation. And no, I did not mean to be rude, and talking about going to RFC is not a threat. seefooddiet (talk) 07:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

For others reading, this was my edit comment: "Disagree. If want to undo again, please post on talk page. If this escalates I'm willing to go to WP:RFC; I'm pretty confident in this."

I wouldn't say this is rude? It's certainly firm, which was my intent, but nothing in this would constitute a threat to most people. seefooddiet (talk) 07:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Regardless, I would again suggest checking talk page history prior to being "firm." Threatening to escalate to RfC without discussion (which is the process) is certainly more than "firm" in my opinion. But here we are. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

CNMall41, I just said I didn't intend to be rude, and I think most people would agree I wasn't there. There's no need to rib me with the sarcastic quotes, that's explicitly not civil. User edited their comment.

Can we discuss the subject matter on the article talk page? Nobody can see it here, again. seefooddiet (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I read what you wrote and believe it was not your intent. Understand that regardless of intent, the statement was more than firm based on the threat to escalate to RfC in lieu of following the process. And yes, the talk page is where the discussion needs to be had (and already was had if you look at the above link). --CNMall41 (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Repeatedly drilling that past talk post into me is also unnecessary.

Please pause for a second. Dial it back. I'm not mad at you and didn't mean to come off rude. Let's please discuss this without drilling things into each other. seefooddiet (talk) 07:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I apologize for mentioning the RFC early. It was not meant to be a threat, it was more an expression that I'm confident in my opinion (even with that thread you linked). But your response to this, even after I tried to deescalate, was to continually drill and prod me relentlessly instead of slowing down. I'm still taken aback by how intense your backlash was. seefooddiet (talk) 07:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Nothing needs dialed back. I do not think you intended any harm based on your statement, but stating that intent or not it wasn't appropriate. When an editor says something like that, it can easily be taken as a threat to someone to not restore the content. Maybe you disagree. There's no deescalation needed as there was no escalation. I am not mad at you either as I don't let Wikipedia stir up feelings. As far as "repeatedly drilling," I was reminding of you the past discussion. Since you didn't address it initially after I provided the link, I was assuming you may have missed it. I'm dropping the stick as I don't have time for back and forth but will gladly opine on the talk page should you start the discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Even this response is needlessly condescending and combative; no effort to accept my apology or deescalate. How are you not seeing how needlessly aggressive your response is in response to a misunderstanding?

Frankly you win; this discussion was so neurotic and I don't have the emotional energy to deal with how neurotic a talk page discussion about Rober will be. I'll link this discussion on Rober's talk page because it's relevant. seefooddiet (talk) 07:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I guess I am not understanding the issue. There is no need for an apology. I also was not escalating, only responding to your replies. This isn't a "need to be right" or "win"" situation. I think you can understand how I mistook your tone by the way you are mistaking mine. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

But here we are. Unnecessary and meant as a jab.

And yes, the talk page is where the discussion needs to be had (and already was had if you look at the above link). The parenthetical side note here reads sarcastic, the first note about the talk page was sufficient. Furthermore, it leaves no room for discussion; that talk post linked I'd argue is not settled fact, but you present it that way. The wording here was avoidable, not just an innocent reminder.

I'm dropping the stick as I don't have time for back and forth As if my efforts to deescalate are not worth the time.

There is no need for an apology. I also was not escalating, only responding to your replies. Disagree.

I've made no similar jabs to these in this thread. If your next response is just doubling down, I'm not going to reply. Apparently not worth your time anyway, despite the continued responses. seefooddiet (talk) 08:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Glad to know that you're back with a new username. Thanks also for the tips you gave in Death's Game peer review. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Ay, thank you! Much appreciated 🙏😌 seefooddiet (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Seefooddiet, would you know what is the equivalent of 기획 in television production? I mean is it a parameter in {{Infobox television}} template or not? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I think maybe doesn't exist, based on Template:Infobox television#Deprecated parameters (see The "Chronology" parameters...). Maybe could use the related parameter if the future item has its own article already. If not, maybe should exclude from the infobox? seefooddiet (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Alright thank you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi again, I have another question, is "제작" consider as "Producer(s)"? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 14:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes I think so seefooddiet (talk) 17:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

I saw from your user page that you are working on Korean articles. When looking at the wiki page for The Korea Herald I saw that it is in a bad state as it relies to heavily on primary sources. At the time I was editing Smilegate and some other korean companies, I found two sources that discuss the Korean Herald to different extents. Since you are interested in Korean articles, I thought you might be interested as a lot of articles probably end up citing this newspaper. I opened a discussion on the talk page here where I go over the sources. In the end, I didn't feel I found enough sources, and I suspect there are much more sources in Korean. J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

It and other major newspapers on my to-do list because of how often they're cited. I did The Korea Times (America) back in April, and The Dong-A Ilbo in March. seefooddiet (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

don't nominate the page i created for deletion, please 🙏 Madame Joaquin (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

It's already been done; I'm just following Wikipedia policy. If you'd like to keep the article around, you can locate more reliable sources and put them in the deletion discussion. I'll change my vote if you can find more. seefooddiet (talk) 05:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, this and this came through my watchlist. According to my knowledge, neither MOS:KO nor WP:NCKO currently stated "hyphen in name is officially discouraged in RR". While, Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Korea (2024 Rewrite & Proposal) has the quoted wordings and also clarified at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Korea (2024 Rewrite & Proposal)#Romanization section, this is still a draft as of this comment. May I know if this was a editing confusion and also I don't expect to see (not from you as I have faith) similar changes being pushed due to this precedence, when the MOS draft isn't yet in production. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

I thought about this a bit. The current MOS (not the draft) says to use RR. Even if it doesn't talk about the hyphen, the official RR guidance does. In other words, regardless of which version of the MOS is being applied, hyphens are discouraged. seefooddiet (talk) 07:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

In my opinion, until the whole/partial draft is in production that already explicitly mentions on official RR stand and hyphens on RR usage, before we start to discouraged usage of hyphens in {{Korean}} and {{Infobox Korean name}}. At least, we have an explicitly official English Wikipedia documentation to reference on hyphens in RR on where is it indeed discourage. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

I lean agree; explaining the edit each time is too cumbersome. I'll hold back on similar hyphen removals until the draft is approved. Thanks for bringing this up! seefooddiet (talk) 08:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the understanding. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Although you never truly left, it is good to see you (officially) back! Dantus21 (talk) 07:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, much appreciated 🙂 seefooddiet (talk) 08:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Just curious, are there any other permissions you'd like in addition to extended-confirmed? I noticed your old account also had autopatrolled. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, autopatrolled would be nice too. If you can approve me for AWB that'd be nice too, but I can request that myself as well. seefooddiet (talk) 23:53, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Did both :) Elli (talk | contribs) 23:58, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Great, thank you! seefooddiet (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

No problem! Am glad you have returned to editing. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Seefooddiet,

I was just taking care of some PROD'd articles on Korean footballers, saw your RTV account name and when I looked into it, saw you were now using this username. Nice to see you back! I posted a good-bye message but it was deleted from your User talk page soonafter, apparently because you had requested to keep this page blank. As long as you weren't being harassed or anything, you might go to your previous account and redirect the User and User talk pages here. Glad we have you back! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Do you mind providing comments on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources about reliable sources? I found the current source list lackluster and have suggested more over there, but that talk page is not very active. You're one of the few I know who're able to analyze them. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. I'll be talking about some prominent sources over there next few weeks, and I'll appreciate if you drop by occasionally. Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 02:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Page is on my watchlist so I'll see it. Thanks for raising these discussions! seefooddiet (talk) 02:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

I didn't even realize you were your previous account at first—welcome back! Remsense ‥ 论 01:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, appreciate it 🙂 seefooddiet (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

I obviously didn't go through them all to check if every single one was made by you, but since they are similar and have similar deletion rationales, I figured that they might be. (From an initial batch of 111 I sifted out one that was prodded by LibStar and one by Simione) If that's the case, it is obviously a misunderstanding or misuse of the WP:PROD process. Do you understand why? It's because people have to have the chance to go through the various candidates, and see if they really are worthy of deletion. Maybe some or even tens of them are, but the possibly good ones are lost in an ocean. 10 prods in a day, maybe, even that is stretching it, but 109 is bordering on Wikipedia:Disruptive editing and also looks like some kind of WP:POINT. Editors have to show more diligence than this - and also provide more accurate reasons for deletion. Geschichte (talk) 05:55, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Oops, it's a misunderstanding; I apologize. I should have done more due diligence in understanding how PROD works before using it so much.

What's the best path for fixing this? Is it possible to mass dePROD, and if so does that close the door for a second PROD? seefooddiet (talk) 05:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Generally speaking, articles shouldn't be PRODed twice, but you can nominate them for deletion through WP:AFD. Part of the WP:PRODNOM process (prong 4) is to consider alternatives to deletion first, which includes improving the article by editing. I interpret that to mean that the PROD nominator should do a name search of both the English and native name first to see if there are sources. I'm going through them to see which have sourcing now but I'm not sure if I can get to them all. --Habst (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

I'll be going through my noms and attempting to verify them soon. seefooddiet (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

While being mindful of the fact that I didn't do enough due diligence or research before some of these prods, I'm a little skeptical of some of the deproding. [1] Some of these sources given during the deproding aren't very substantial. I may move to a deletion discussion for some of them regardless. seefooddiet (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@Seefooddiet, thanks, I think that is fair. Re: the link, Olympedia is actually not a wiki, it's run by Bill Mallon and was officially affiliated with the Olympics at the time that profile was added, so I think it's suitable to use as a source especially when biography prose like the Worlds finishes are added. --Habst (talk) 12:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

• I'm sorry, but this is just ridiculous. It is inappropriate to mass PROD – with no BEFORE whatsoever – well over 100 historical Olympians with the only explanation effectively being 'not notable' (an argument to avoid). I removed the PRODs; I'd say that likely even a majority of those might be notable (given South Korea seems to have decent coverage of their Olympians), especially if one were to actually look in the appropriate places (e.g. South Korean newspaper archives). You can AFD some of them now that they've been dePRODed, but please do some sort of BEFORE search next time and make sure you're doing it in a reasonable quantity; no one is going to be able to sort through the notable ones when there's over 100 nominated rapidly. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

  My mistake, I apologize. It won't happen again. seefooddiet (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Busan

added a link pointing to Donghae

Gangwon Province, South Korea

added a link pointing to Donghae

Suwon

added a link pointing to Hwaseong

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Busan

added a link pointing to Donghae

Gangwon Province, South Korea

added a link pointing to Donghae

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

I've been doing some fixes of "the the", and I noticed one of your AWB edits changed:

According to the [[Korea Times]]

to

According to the [[The Korea Times]]

I just wanted to say those automatic redirect replacements should be used with care and ideally individually checked when you have them enabled in an edit. Not a big deal, just something worth keeping in mind with AWB functions that change prose. Retro (talk | contribs) 18:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I really do check every individual change; I just make some mistakes. I'll add a line in my script to check for that error. seefooddiet (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kang Full

added a link pointing to Hwaseong

Lee Choon-jae

added a link pointing to Hwaseong

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Please do not merge Dex Kim Jin Young to his Korean wikipedia, Dex (Youtuber). The fans asked for an International wikipedia page for Dex since they are unable to search for the korean wiki in english on Google. Moreover, the DEX Kim Jin Young page has more updated and detailed facts about Dex. Bengoshi0 (talk) 04:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Or if all the details on the DEX Kim Jin Young page can be transferred, and the fans could search his wikipedia page in english, that would be great. Bengoshi0 (talk) 04:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Bengoshi0, the fans can do what they like on Wikia, not here. Drmies (talk) 04:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Almost all korean celebrities has an international wikipedia page. What is the basis of having this deleted? Bengoshi0 (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't know what an "international wikipedia page" means. You made a new article under a bad name. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

An international wikipedia page would mean - searching Dex's name in english and his wikipedia page showing up. Anyway, if that could be done, I couldn't care less if the article gets deleted. All the fans wanted is just to have a searchable wikipedia page for Dex as they thought he is famous enough to have one. Bengoshi0 (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

That already can be done through WP:REDIRECTs. You just need to create various redirects that point to a single page. seefooddiet (talk) 04:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Just stopping by to say "thanks" for the work you're doing at that article. Joyous! Noise! 18:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Glad to do it; Wikipedia's reputation for rigor also impacts my own writing on the website and I was in a unique position to contribute as a Korean speaker. seefooddiet (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pyeongchon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dongan District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

HELLO, I just noticed you renamed the template while I was editing, so now there are two ethnic groups pages for South Korea. You can delete Template:Ethnic groups in Republic of Korea if you want — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leoshuo (talk • contribs) 23:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi seefooddiet, your AWB cleanup script is sometimes adding |trans-script-title= to citation templates instead of |script-title= (example). That isn't a valid parameter, so it's causing CS1 errors. Please fix the script to not cause errors. Thanks! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 04:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. Will add that now. Thanks for pointing that out! seefooddiet (talk) 04:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sang-sup Lee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of Cultural Merit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Just FYI you can use {{Outdent}}. Northern Moonlight 02:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks; admittedly it was a little out of laziness that I didn't use it. You right though. seefooddiet (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi Seefooddiet. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, what exactly do you mean by your reference to the Japanese Wikipedia? I'm not familiar with whatever it is you're talking about. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 07:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Sent email seefooddiet (talk) 11:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

as i am american you should try this cheeseburger 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 04:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Yum seefooddiet (talk) 06:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey, @Seefooddiet. In case you haven't noticed Ttongsul has now been renamed Use of human faeces in traditional medicine. -- 00101984hjw (talk) 23:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks will resolve it today seefooddiet (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Seefooddiet. I noticed you recently created the Lee Seo-hyun article, and I'm assuming you might be interested in expanding this Draft:Lee family (South Korea) and helping it get past the submission. 81.79.53.64 (talk) 09:15, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing it to my attention! I have a lot of projects I'm currently working on, and I suspect other people are likely to take on this topic (both non-Koreans and Koreans are widely interested in the topic and public knowledge of it is relatively high), so my motivation to work on it is a little lower. If I do take this on it'll be at least 3-4 months later. seefooddiet (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Seefooddiet! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Yue🌙 21:42, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey, merry Christmas to you as well! 🙂 It's been great working with you this year, looking forward to more in the future. All the best! seefooddiet (talk) 23:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Please do not post on my talk page anymore. I will simply delete it. I have come to realize that your personality does not lend itself to reasoned discussion. You just want to get digs in on people. Westwind273 (talk) 04:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

I haven't posted on your talk page since your request. It's not worth it because you just delete everything, including the insults you've made at others in the past. The ANI thread (linking for others to see) will handle the rest. seefooddiet (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soda Kaichi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prince of Erebor -- Prince of Erebor (talk) 08:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

	Happy New Year 2025!

Aidillia^(talk) 10:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Happy new year to you too 🙂 All the best to you in 2025! seefooddiet (talk) 10:21, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Soda Kaichi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soda Kaichi for comments about the article, and Talk:Soda Kaichi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Prince of Erebor -- Prince of Erebor (talk) 15:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Excellent work on the article!! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you 🙂 thanks for the review! seefooddiet (talk) 23:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sinhanch'on you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 18:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

The AP (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hyochang Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 11:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey! I've been looking for interesting article writing areas to write in, and the South Korean articles offer you posted to WP:REWARD seems enticing (I don't need the money though, I'd just like to help, you can donate it to a charity if you'd like when I make each article). I have a working competency in reading/writing Korean. Thanks for offering this! :) MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 10:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Sure! And note that anything pre-1948 Korea is also fair game, not just South Korea topics. Lmk if you ever need help with any articles. If someone else needs help as well, I may reach out to you if that's ok! seefooddiet (talk) 10:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Sure, I'm more than happy to help anyone out if they need it, it's just that Korean is my 2nd language so I probably won't be able to help people interpret any academic sources or papers. Thanks again for running this, I think I will work on Three Kingdoms of Korea (it's top-importance) because someone else back on the other page was asking for help with that article, and it would be great to help 2 people at once! :) MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 04:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for taking that topic on, indeed important 🙂 I think coverage of it in English should be more than enough. Some narrower topics like Park Chung Hee and Sejong the Great have surprisingly poor coverage in English; I was thinking about those. But broad historical periods are pretty well served in English seefooddiet (talk) 04:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Oh perfect, I'll have a look at those! Thank you for your suggestions :) MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 04:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Sinhanch'on you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sinhanch'on for comments about the article, and Talk:Sinhanch'on/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution, Can you wait for about 10 minutes when another user is editing? I was adding related sources according to the editing format. If possible, I will try to include the sources together with the main text in the future. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Per [2] I'd like to request that you withhold from editing those articles in the near future. Are you a Korean speaker by any chance? I've noticed that you've been mistranslating things; on a WP:BLP and on a page about a national crisis I think it's worrying. I wouldn't feel comfortable making these mistakes... Alledging the allowing of the use of swords is really serious. seefooddiet (talk) 13:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Seefood diet Thank you for your contribution. I will try to follow your suggestion. I have corrected the grammar below. Could you please review and add it to the lead section? Mr. Yoon is being investigated on charges of sedition and treason. [1], and he has been impeached by the National Assembly. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 13:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for being receptive. We don't use "Mr." on Wikipedia, per MOS:MR. There's an extra space and comma in that sentence. In the lead of that article, it already mentions the impeachment. Treason and sedition may be able to go in, but those are just investigations. I think may be better to wait until he's actually convicted for those to go in. seefooddiet (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback. It's an issue that has caused national harm even before the guilty verdict, so I think it would be good to include that part, so I'm planning to include it with more supporting references. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 13:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Please, please consider holding back. Each of these edits has issues in them and the topic is so sensitive that I'm not sure these edits are helping the situation. I may ask others to take a look at these edits and give their thoughts on whether they are appropriate if this continues. seefooddiet (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello SeeFooddiet, I am an American who speaks Korean like you.The following content contains information that Yoon Seok-yeol ordered the use of a knife. If you accidentally missed the information and please reverted it, Or I can do it later.

• The first ref contains the relevant content (e.g. about Knife) in the video included in the news, and
• the second ref contains the relevant content in the text.

Translated news content: "He reportedly gave instructions to 'stop the police who were coming to arrest me with a knife, even if they were not guns,'" the report said.

Original news content: ‘나를 체포하려고 접근하는 경찰들에게 총은 안 되더라도 칼이라도 휴대해서 무조건 막으라’는 지시를 했다고 한다”고 전했다.

---

Yoon Seok-yeol requested the Presidential Security Service to use force such as a sword to stop the police who were coming to arrest him. Executives of the Presidential Security Service complained that Yoon Seok-yeol's instructions were wrong, and sent 15 security guards on leave. ^{[1] [2]}

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 14:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

칼 is not necessarily "sword", it more frequently refers to knives. Swords would be bizarre in 2025. Are you a Korean speaker? seefooddiet (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yonggeumok you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Yonggeumok you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yonggeumok for comments about the article, and Talk:Yonggeumok/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gogi-guksu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

I very much owe you an apology; my behavior at Talk:Arrest of Yoon Suk Yeol was unbelievably erratic. I honestly shouldn't have been so pushy over something as minor as an article's notability. — 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 00:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Nono it's ok, please don't worry about it! Thank you for the apology 🙂 seefooddiet (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Hyochang Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hyochang Park for comments about the article, and Talk:Hyochang Park/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 01:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Gogi-guksu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gogi-guksu for comments about the article, and Talk:Gogi-guksu/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much for contributing various information about South Korea. I work on Korean Wikipedia and English Wikipedia. I mainly supplement Korean Wikipedia articles about Korea that are not translated into English and translate them into English Wikipedia. Do you know how to translate an article that has already been translated into English? I would like to translate a short article with Korean news articles. Thank you. 감사합니다. LandAndTree (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, could you rephrase your question? I didn't quite understand it. 한국어로 쓰셔도 됩니다. seefooddiet (talk) 17:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

한국에 대한 방대한 기여에 감사드립니다. 사용자 소개 문서를 읽었습니다만 저도 공감합니다. 한국 관련 내용이 상대적으로 부실하다는 느낌을 받았습니다. 아마 한국에서는 위키백과 말고 다른 위키 서비스가 더 인기가 있는데 그러다보니 한국어 위키백과 내용은 부실해지게 되고 그래서 영어 문서도 이 영향을 받지 않나 추측해봅니다. 저는 최근 한국어 위키백과의 내용이 부실한 한국 관련 문서를 보강하고 이를 영어 위키백과로 번역하고 있습니다. 이 번역 기능을 안지도 얼마 안됐습니다. 그런데 이미 번역된 문서, 예컨대 Innospace라는 한국 우주 기업을 보강코자 한다면 꼭 영문으로 된 자료를 각주로 하여야 하는가요? 아무래도 한국 기업이다보니 한국 신문사를 각주로 넣는 것이 내용도 더 방대할텐데 이게 규정상 안 되는 걸로 알고 있어서요. 한국어 자료로 영어 위키백과 보강이 가능하다면 그 방법을 아시나 해서 이렇게 질문드립니다. LandAndTree (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

네 비영어 자료를 각주로 사용할 수 있습니다. 이것은 실제로 영어 위키백과 정책에 의해 허용됩니다. 하지만 영어 자료에 대한 선호도가 있습니다. WP:NONENG Citations to non-English reliable sources are allowed on the English Wikipedia. However, because this project is in English, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when they are available and of equal quality and relevance.

예 (제 기사들): Yonggeumok, Soda Kaichi. 제가 영어 위키백과에서 사용하는 자료의 약 절반이 한국어로 되어 있습니다. seefooddiet (talk) 18:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

답변 감사드립니다. 제가 만든 문서(HD Hyundai Robotics나 Doosan Robotics 등)에 짧은 설명을 바로 달아주시던데 감사드립니다. 그런데 어떻게 한국 관련 새 문서를 빨리 아실 수 있나요? 그 최근 변경 탭에 필터가 있나요? LandAndTree (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea#New articles 여기에서 확인할 수 있습니다. 이 상자는 하루에 한 번 업데이트됩니다. seefooddiet (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

좋은 거 알아냈네요. 저도 위키프로젝트 코리아에 조금전 가입했습니다. 늦은 시각 계속 질문드려서 죄송하지만 (미국이신가요?) 영어 위키백과에 일본이나 다른 아시아 국가에 대한 문서에 비해서 한국 문서가 많이 빈약한 편인가요? 혹시 전반적인 수준이 어느정도일까요? LandAndTree (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

아 저는 현재 미국에 살고 있습니다. 네 많이 빈약 편입니다... 여러 통계로 보입니다.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea#Article assessment 이 표에서 영어 위키백과에서 한국과 관련된 총 페이지 수를 확인할 수 있습니다 (현재 57,681개). 근데 일본이 124,794개 있고, 중국이 103,418개 있습니다. 하지만 서양인들이 일본에 불균형적으로 관심을 가지고 있기 때문에 일본은 이례적인 경우입니다. 베트남은 17,793개 있습니다.

또한, 이 표들에서 기사 품질 등급을 확인할 수 있습니다. FA, GA가 최고 급, Stub이 최하. FA/GA 등급을 받기 어렵습니다. 다른 사용자는 귀하의 기사를 자세히 검토한 다음 할당해야 합니다. 일본이 FA가 많은 편입니다; 열 배 더 많습니다.

아마 한국에서는 위키백과 말고 다른 위키 서비스가 더 인기가 있는데 그러다보니 한국어 위키백과 내용은 부실해지게 되고 그래서 영어 문서도 이 영향을 받지 않나 추측해봅니다. 저도 같은 생각입니다.

[3] 여기서 언어별 위키백과 통계를 확인 할 수 있습니다. "Monthly unique devices" (월간 고유 기기)을 대략적으로 해석해 보면, 한국 인구의 절반도 안 되는 사람들이 한국어 위키백과를 사용하고 있다는 것을 알 수 있습니다 (22,377,889). 하지만 일본 인구의 약 80%가 일본어 위키백과를 사용합니다.

나*위키가 존재하지 않았다면 상황이 훨씬 더 좋았을 것입니다. seefooddiet (talk) 19:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

매일 두세개씩 문서를 번역하면 1년에 1000개 문서를 만들 수 있겠네요. 열심히 번역해봐야겠습니다. 일단 앞으로는 한국의 기업들을 번역할 계획입니다. 한국 기업 번역이 잘 안되어 있더라고요.. LandAndTree (talk) 19:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

감사합니다. 질문이 있거나 도움이 필요하시면 언제든지 말씀해 주세요. seefooddiet (talk) 19:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:1920s disestablishments in Korea indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

The article The Korea Daily News you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Korea Daily News and Talk:The Korea Daily News/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

The article The Korea Daily News you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Korea Daily News for comments about the article, and Talk:The Korea Daily News/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

안녕하세요, Seeofooddiet님? Chollian-2A 문서를 번역하였는데 한국어 위키백과의 「천리안 2A」문서와 연결이 안되어서 조언을 구하고자 합니다. 아마 원래 영문 문서가 2020년에 Chollian으로 연결되도록 만들어져서 이로 인한 오류인지 모르겠습니다만 혹시 어떻게 하면 될까요? 감사합니다. 지금 미국이 새벽 시간이네요. LandAndTree (talk) 08:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

언어 간의 기사는 일반적으로 위키데이터를 사용하여 연결됩니다. 때로는 수동으로 연결해야 합니다. ko:천리안 2A호 페이지 오른쪽에 "언어 간 링크 추가" 링크를 눌러 주세요. 때때로 이미 기사에 대한 위키데이터 아이템이 있을 수 있습니다. 이 경우에는 없으므로 새 아이템을 만들어야 합니다. 그런 다음 "Wikipedia" 상자를 편집하고 영어 위키백과 기사를 추가하면 두 페이지가 모두 연결됩니다. seefooddiet (talk) 08:50, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

대단히 감사드립니다. LandAndTree (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Nouera § Merge. I can't interact because of WP:IBAN. 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 23:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Seefooddiet, regarding your post on the list of South Korean national treasures, I actually wanted awhile ago to try and create something about the Jeju treasures list (제주특별자치도의보물). However, there are so many more hundreds of them, and I couldn't find a comprehensive list. There are so many that I doubt they all have notability, but they might work as a list. They aren't really covered on ko.wiki either. Are you aware of any information on the topic? Best, CMD (talk) 07:02, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

[4] I think this is a complete list? Is there only 7? This is the kowiki category: ko:분류:제주특별자치도의 보물. seefooddiet (talk) 07:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

I found that list too, but it doesn't seem to be what I'm looking for. For example, I was also looking at creating an article for the Tamnasullyeokdo (탐라순력도), which is supposedly Treasure No. 652-6 (보물 제652-6호). CMD (talk) 08:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

To my understanding, the "652-6" is counting the total number of treasures across all of South Korea. ko:대한민국의 보물 lists over 2000 treasures. ko:대한민국의 보물 (1970년대 후반) has 652, and ko:이형상 수고본 lists 652-6. seefooddiet (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Ah thanks! That's very helpful and makes a lot of sense, clearly I have encountered a bit of local pride, possibly as the National Treasure (South Korea) does not include anything in Jeju. I did find ko:탐라순력도, but as you can see sadly not that many sources to work from. I see one or two places in Historic Sites (South Korea) which might be easier to write about, maybe I'll start with them in a week or so. If I do I'll put them into your WT:KR section. CMD (talk) 09:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Nice 🙂 I visit Jeju pretty often; was just there again last month. I wrote a few Jeju-related articles like Doldam, Dol hareubang, Olle (alley), and Bangsatap. I'll be joining you in writing more! seefooddiet (talk) 09:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh wow, those are nice articles. The etymology part of Bangsatap is very enlightening; I don't think I ever came across the word bangsatap, but did come across dap and geobuk. I have quite a few topics in my mind relating to Jeju that need articles, I just need to find the time to sort through my thoughts. I have noticed that even ko.wiki pages lack images for places in Jeju, so I will try and get around to finding some of those too. CMD (talk) 09:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Just a quick question: do any sources in Korean cover this album? It would help a lot in determining its notability. — 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 11:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

I can't find any Korean-language news sources that seem to cover it. Only English-language. seefooddiet (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)