The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a photograph of two-dimensional artwork, we would need to know when it was created to determine whether it is PD for age, or copyrighted by the original artist. Uploader's claim of owning the rights is likely based upon the fact that s/he took this picture, a common mistake. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photograph of a painting made by Wood's daughter. I don't understand why if I take a picture of another painting that it isn't in the public domain. Such an argument to the contrary would seem quite silly to me. As to the age of the painting; I don't know. I didn't see it labeled on the painting.Chhe (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this could be considered a derivative work due to the picture of the frame shown?Chhe (talk) 03:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, but we need to know whether the painting is still copyrighted. Stifle (talk) 08:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect licence - Self-taken photo of a probably copyrighted work makes this a derivative work. I could not think of a reasonable rationale to change the licencing Peripitus (Talk) 03:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As with the above image, the only question is the age of the painting. If the painting itself is in the public domain, the photograph can obviously be so released; if it is not, then the photo cannot be. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to find out who and when painted this without luck. - Peripitus (Talk) 07:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who painted it or how old it is.Chhe (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the painting hanging - perhaps they have a website that tells us the age and creator of this portrait ? - Peripitus (Talk) 21:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Website states all rights reserved. Ecosse99 (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Website shows photos are copyrighted to EADS. Ecosse99 (talk) 06:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source. No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 07:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as CC-self but this appears to be a scan of a copyrighted music cover Peripitus (Talk) 06:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as self-created under a CC-by-SA-3.0 licence but the origional is on flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/zefdelgadillo/2516481981/sizes/l/) under a no-derivatives licence. I cannot confirm of course if the flickr licence has been changed . Peripitus (Talk) 07:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely. Flickr uses cc 2.0 licenses. Stifle (talk) 08:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is at http://www.flickr.com/photos/franktoth/469445750/ although the image there is smaller and uploaded to WP earlier feydey (talk) 08:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the flickr image is a copyvio due to the false claims on it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image of a stamp - may be old enough to be PD but without details I cannot tell. I suspect that this is a copyrighted item Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mural is original work - No indication of that works status here Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright in artwork not mentioned.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. It's my own picture, I say so, I say explicitly "Photograph copyright ©2002 by Daniel P. B. Smith. Licensed under the terms of the Wikipedia Copyright," which was the phraseology favored at the time, and I included the GFDL license.

What more "mention" do you need than "Photograph copyright ©2002 by Daniel P. B. Smith?"

The issue isn't the photograph, it's the artwork you photographed which may have a seperate copyright. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -Andrew c ^[talk] 00:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See http://www.ansp.org/library/permissions.php - Although if original is PD Bridgmen applies? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lear died in 1888, so the work is certainly old enough. {{PD-art}} certainly applies. In my opinion, this looks like copyfraud by the ANSP. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source. No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Source [1] plainly states all rights reserved. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Ecosse99 (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image appears professionally done from field level; relatively low resolution and lack of metadata. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolusion and may be copy fron website - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 19:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image (which seems to have been taken from an incredibly privileged viewpoint) looks like a screen capture from a video. Although the image is released as PD by the uploader, a website source is given; the image couldn't be found there. The uploader (Max rspct) is a frequent contributor, but he has not responded to requests for clarification. Gump Stump (talk) 19:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image was uploaded by RYP, who is the person in the picture. While he is notable, the image is copyrighted by the photographer (Spencer Mandell), so it can't be released under the licenses claimed. - Gump Stump (talk) 21:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CC-BY-SA claim per source site but image has watermarks Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Mouse is protected design Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protected from what? The artist drew it by himself...so it's a photograph of a freehand drawing of Mickey. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 23:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...which drawing is a derivative work of the copyrighted character Mickey Mouse. Stifle (talk) 08:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.