- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- RoboMop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. No significant coverage and so I am nominating for AfD per WP:PRODUCT. — Keithbob • Talk • 23:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as commercial spam. Why didn't you prod it first to avoid wasting our time with this rubbish? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC).
- Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion disccussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - Some sources:
- As Seen on TV: RoboMaid/RoboMop may have a better future as a toy. AOL Money and Finance.
- Hello Kitty cleans up her act with RoboMop. CNet.
- Weak keep - as just meeting WP:GNG per the sources in my comment above. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 08:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.