The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 10:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pruning poem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced stub from 2009; essentially a WP:DICDEF, searching for RS coverage yields no useful results. Elli (talk | contribs) 08:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk | contribs) 08:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Expanded and cited. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; per Nikkimaria. Fine, useful, policy-compliant short article. Antandrus (talk) 15:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; As per Nikkimaria. Seems to pass GNG bar now. Hulatam (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Blocked for UPE. MER-C 13:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Definitely fits Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Ambrosiawater (talk) 19:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep After Nikki's work is no longer a DICDEF, reasonable context for a reasonable article on an interesting and relevant topic. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.