Sõda

MEEDIAVALVUR: algab „sõjalise erioperatsiooni“ teine etapp nimega „SÕDA“

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per the discussion below, nomination gladly withdrawn. The points in the discussion, while not establishing notability, do give a reason to presume there may be non-trivial sources that address the topic directly and in-depth. (non-admin closure)   // Timothy :: talk  16:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Moedwil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE - For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". WP:BEFORE revealed no additional WP:RS that address the subject directly and in-depth that would establish notability.   // Timothy :: talk  02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  02:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Cullen328 found a source that appears to be non-trivial. In addition, while the the brief mentions I and others have found don't establish notability, they do give a reason to believe there may be other non-trival sources that address the topic directly and in-depth. AleatoryPonderings brings up some points that again, while they don't establish notability, make me believe sources could well exist. So to err on the side of caution and not delete a potential good article, I'll happily switch to keep on the presumption they exist. (re: AleatoryPonderings aside comment: I always find your comments useful and thoughtful).   // Timothy :: talk  16:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kommenteeri