The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Solar Loan Programme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 4-year loan program of United Nations Environment Programme. Won some awards. I don't think it as a notable programme when UNEP funds many programs every year. It can be deleted after a two sentences summary dropped in UNEP article. I don't think redirect is useful either. The article looks like an essay with half of it unreferenced. Nizil (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 04:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Article is written like an essay and is not encyclopaedic in format. Does not meet WP:SIGCOV --Whiteguru (talk) 20:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.