The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deunta Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet the criteria of WP:NCOLLATH or the more general notability guidelines. He did not play professionally, did not win and was not nominated for any national awards, did not win or play in any national championships and has received only scant attention in the press. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and American football. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. A search of Newspapers.com turns up more than "scant" attention. E.g., (1) this (part 1/part 2), (2) this (part 1/part 2), (3) this (part 1/part 2), (4) this part 1/part 2), (5) this,and (6) this. Cbl62 (talk) 05:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Denniscabrams: In light of Alvaldi's substantial expansion of the article, and the additional sourcing, would you consider withdrawing this so all can move on to more productive matters? Cbl62 (talk) 03:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A successful college football player who passes WP:GNG with the significant coverage found by Cbl62 which comes from multiple publications from span of a few years. Alvaldi (talk) 08:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY, with much thanks to Alvaldi and Cbl62. casualdejekyll 22:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.