The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Epps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject appears to be a routine academic without any indication of meeting WP:PROF or WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable secondary sources. Significant coverage is not understood to include mere mentions in media. Receiving an honorable mention for a junior scholar's award does not constitute a major academic prize. This article seems to exist solely for self-promotional purposes. Notability requires more than merely holding a faculty position at a law school. Without independent recognition, awards, or influence beyond their institution, routine faculty members do not merit standalone articles per longstanding consensus. LogicSoup (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - although tenured, he's not a named chair, nor does he have a distinguished citation record. Please ping me if you're aware of any other way he can pass the PROF test. Bearian (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law, Massachusetts, Missouri, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete An associate professor, no notable awards, nothing special about his publication history. I could easily consider this to be TOOSOON and see no reason why it can't come back after this person's career is more mature. Lamona (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.