The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deletion unopposed.  Sandstein  09:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of CECB units (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is becoming nothing more than a list of converter boxes eligible for defunct government-funded discount program, and it almost reads like a historical advertisement. No notability is established to me, in spite of citations. Almost no one wants to read the list of boxes anymore as I believe. However, I'm afraid there would be too many keeps because of then-advertisment now-historical status. Maybe back then this article definate had reasons to be kept, but this is different now. Gh87 (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. A huge amount of really useless detail, most of it unsourced. The fact that the CECB program is defunct makes me even less enthusiastic than I would(n't) have been about this page otherwise. Maybe some material can be smerged from here to Coupon-eligible converter box, but this page contains so much dense detail that I would definitely not support simply copying this page. Richwales (talk · contribs) 02:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.