The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Banu Mutallib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no significant coverage, fails the general notability guideline. ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 01:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to "Banu Muttalib". The current article name appears to be a typo; "Banu Muttalib" has quite a few hits. I wouldn't necessarily object to deletion, but it seems like this could be a decent article if someone put time into it. Anerdw (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unsourced one-sentence stub. Should've been sent to draftspace instead of being nominated here. No reason to keep, at least not in its current state. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as it stands now.Nyasalones (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.