Happy First Edit Day, TheBritinator, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. TheBritinator (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Second Adrian Hasler cabinet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a member of the second Adrian Hasler cabinet was expelled in 2019 following an embezzlement scandal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Second Adrian Hasler cabinet. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Second Adrian Hasler cabinet), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheBritinator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Safavid-tarkovsky war".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, TheBritinator! The list you nominated, List of heads of government of Liechtenstein, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1939 Liechtenstein general election, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that no actual voting took place in the 1939 Liechtenstein general election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1939 Liechtenstein general election. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1939 Liechtenstein general election), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, TheBritinator, and welcome the Women in Red. I see you have already started creating biographies of women from Liechtenstein and look forward to many more. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through the tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I noticed that you added IPA to some articles. Please follow H:IPA-DE and don't add strange IPA. Thanks. --BigBullfrog (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the Liechtenstein-related articles, which other articles have you added IPA to? Please let me know and I will correct them.--BigBullfrog (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only added some IPA to Liechtenstein heads of government about 9 months ago. TheBritinator (talk) 14:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor
		In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello TheBritinator, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Toadspike [Talk] 20:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Toadspike [Talk] 20:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello TheBritinator, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 23:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! TheBritinator (talk) 02:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello TheBritinator, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, — Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 01:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

— Your local Sink Cat (The Sink). 01:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! TheBritinator (talk) 02:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The article is now adequate. Tempo21 (talk) 17:51, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fasci Nazionali for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Fasci Nazionali to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fasci nazionali for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Fasci nazionali to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jeri Arredondo for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Jeri Arredondo to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:47, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lasertec Corporation for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Lasertec Corporation to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Live Love Laugh Die for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Live Love Laugh Die to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Logan peacock for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Logan peacock to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marja Horowitz for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Marja Horowitz to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheBritinator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Pat Boone Chevy Showroom for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want The Pat Boone Chevy Showroom to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JJP_Master (she/they) 18:49, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Liechtenstein government councillors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 00:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century deputy heads of government of Liechtenstein has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 00:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review what defining categories mean. You seem to have eagerly overcategorized Category:20th-century Liechtenstein people in the 19th-century when they're not defined in the 19th-century. For example, Franz Xaver Hoop was born in 1886, buy he shouldn't be added to Category:19th-century Liechtenstein people, because he wasn't defined by being active in the 19th-century. ^SMason_Garrison 00:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBritinator I recommend reviewing Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people. It will help you avoid basic misclassifications like the ones I described, and it should assist you in crafting more compelling arguments at CFD. ^SMason_Garrison 00:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, but please do not bring up active discussions onto my talk page. TheBritinator (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't planning on it. That would make the CFD much harder to follow. ^SMason_Garrison 00:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by "defined by being active in the 19th-century". I added that category because they were people who lived in Liechtenstein in the 19th-century. That's the way I interpreted it. TheBritinator (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may have interpreted it that way, but that's not how categorization works. These people were not notable in the 19th century, nor were they notable for being from the 19th-century. Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people ^SMason_Garrison 00:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Xaver Hoop isn't notable for being a 19th-century Liechtensteinian, even though he was alive in the 19th-century century. He was notable for being a 20th-century politician. ^SMason_Garrison 00:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So why did you remove most of the categories from Category:Hans Brunhart, for example? Neither of the policies you linked would suggest that to be the case. Take Category:20th-century presidents of the United States for example, this is what I based my work on when doing the heads of government. TheBritinator (talk) 01:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hans Brunhart is an eponymous category. I recommend looking at Wikipedia:EPONCAT for policy guidance. An eponymous category should have only the categories of its article that are relevant to the category's content. I was likely a tad overzealous, but Recipients of the Order of Merit of the Principality of Liechtenstein doesn't apply to the vast majority of the contents, particularly, Premiership of Hans Brunhart. ^SMason_Garrison 01:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So how is it different from Category:Theodore Roosevelt, for example? Why does that include these categories, but this shouldn't? TheBritinator (talk) 01:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like an IP added some extra categories. Let me fix that. ^SMason_Garrison 01:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you just added heads of government back to them but that doesn't answer my question. Category:Presidents of the United States specifically has a the individual articles in that category, but then the centuries one has both the indvidual article and their respective category. That's what I based mine on. It has been this way since 2018. TheBritinator (talk) 01:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't ask me about the individual articles, you asked me about the category. ^SMason_Garrison 02:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used Hans Brunhart and Theodore Roosevelt as examples. TheBritinator (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but my point is that you didn't ask me about the articles; you asked me about the eponymous category. The guidance is different. Circling back, yes I added the heads of gov parent category back while I was in the process of making an eponymous category for the heads of state -- Category:Wikipedia categories named after heads of government of Liechtenstein.^SMason_Garrison 02:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but that still doesn't answer my question. From what I've gathered it would be appropriate to add back 21st/20th heads of government back to the respective personal category. I have given you what I was basing my work off. TheBritinator (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so the categories applied to eponymous categories, as a rule of thumb, are ones that would apply to the contents within the category as well. So for the Hans Brunhart category, I don't think that the 21st/20th heads of government category would apply because the contents of Hans Brunhart also includes :Category:Premiership of Hans Brunhart. ^SMason_Garrison 04:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Just wanted to acknowledge the amazing work you do on Liechtenstein election articles – the level of detail being added (compared to much larger countries) is fantastic. Number 57 14:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. This means a lot coming from you. TheBritinator (talk) 18:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TheBritinator. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Liechtenstein general elections – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 7. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Johannes Kaiser (Liechtenstein politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Johannes Kaiser was the leading opponent to Liechtenstein's accession to the International Monetary Fund? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Johannes Kaiser. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Johannes Kaiser (Liechtenstein politician)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1937 Liechtenstein spy affair you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1937 Liechtenstein spy affair you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1937 Liechtenstein spy affair for comments about the article, and Talk:1937 Liechtenstein spy affair/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 20:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than adding a link every time you create a new article on the local elections, wouldn't it be easier to add all the local elections in one go? There's no issue with having redlinks on templates like this. Might save a bit of work. Great effort (as always) on creating the articles though! Cheers, Number 57 00:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought about that but I'm making these articles on a source-by-source basis. As I'm sure you've seen the sourcing is quite weak so I'm unsure as to how far back I'm going to be able to take it. Bassicly, I am just adding them as I go, though you make a good point. TheBritinator (talk) 00:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @TheBritinator! Happy new year. Just to let you know there's another Brixton meetup at Brixton Library next Monday 27th Jan at 6pm if you're free. We're currently deciding on a 'theme' so if you have any ideas let us know! Colette Lambeth (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1999–2001 Liechtenstein financial crisis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1999–2001 Liechtenstein financial crisis caused the country to be blacklisted by the Financial Action Task Force? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1999–2001 Liechtenstein financial crisis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1999–2001 Liechtenstein financial crisis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 25 § Category:2027 in Asia on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, TheBritinator,

Categories can not be deleted until they are empty. Please remove all of the articles in the categories you tagged for speedy deletion so that they can be deleted. This should be done by you, the editor who nominated them for deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, one moment. TheBritinator (talk) 12:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Done. TheBritinator (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to TheBritinator for accumulating at least 50 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 February 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2025 Liechtenstein general election, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity, I do not think that a Liechtenstein election falls under NOTNEWS, nor would I ever make that claim. In fact, I am an inclusionist editor who broadly supports letting more things on to ITN and letting more articles continue to exist on the encyclopedia as opposed to deleting them over notability concerns... so, my view is the precise opposite of the position you have accused me of holding in bad faith. Rather, I was using the most recent thing we had posted to ITN as an example to illustrate that the standard proposed my Masem is, in my opinion, too onerous and a misinterpretation of the NOTNEWS policy. This is because the very high bar "enduring notability" threshold, if applied consistently, would need to capture both smaller-scale elections as well as mass-casualty accidents. Nowhere at all in that rationale is a statement that Liechtenstein should not be on Wikipedia or that those articles don't deserve to be here. In the future, there is need to jump to public accusations against others so quickly. Thanks, Flip^andFlopped ツ 05:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out. Admittedly, I am now more confused on what you are trying to say. I interpreted this as you saying that elections in smaller elections, such as Liechtenstein, should not be put on ITN due to them not being as notable as say other countries. I do apologise for my response being rather brash, but it rubbed me the wrong way. If this is not what you meant then it would be great to clear this up.

Also, your point about Haas was not relevant, as putting a suitable image for the newest blurb on ITN is standard practice. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 06:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to clarify. I said,

"I would argue that a sizeable chunk of even our ITNR items, such as the recent Liechtenstein elections as one example among many, do not come anywhere close to meeting the overly high bar of enduring notability which you describe."

When you read the full thread in context, it's clear I was using the Liechtenstein election article as an example - to demonstrate my view that Masem's proposed interpretation of WP:NOTNEWS is too restrictive. I never suggested that the article you worked on should not exist or is not notable.

To your second and unrelated point, I had a genuine quality concern about the choice of image used. I can see you've improved the article now though, so I am happy to go adjust my comment... that's all I was asking for. And no, we do not always accompany the newest blurb with an image (for example, not all of the blurbs below the current top blurb had a corresponding image). We regularly discuss whether an image is appropriate depending on the context, and that can include corresponding discussions about quality of the image/article. Expressing those concerns is the point of having ITN discussions.

With the utmost respect, you bringing this up now despite these two things being somewhat unrelated sort of makes it seem like you are accusing me of bad faith in another unrelated discussion out of anger or retaliation that I expressed a quality concern about articles which you worked on (Haas/2025 Liechtenstein Election). I have no issue with you or with your articles, there is no need for bludgeoning and going on the attack across other threads. Flip^andFlopped ツ 06:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I apologise for being brash, but I can assure you that there is no bludgeoning going on here. I understand why you brought up quality concerns regarding the Haas article, but your point was still not relevant to the nomination. As I and other editors pointed out, there is no quality requirement for non-bolded articles, and using suitable images for new ITN items is standard practice. Concerns for the image quality are fine to be brought up, but that has no relevance as to the article itself. TheBritinator (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle:[1] 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi TheBritinator. I've seen you write good articles about Liechtenstein topics in the past. I was wondering if you could take a look at Louis Frommelt and Remo Sele, two Liechtenstein Olympians who were proposed for deletion, and see if you can find any coverage of them. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration. From a quick search I was able to find passing mentions of Remo Sele in newspapers over the years from points of his career. Not sure if that would meet SIGCOV, however. TheBritinator (talk) 19:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Free play. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it consists of machine-generated text and clearly NOT ready for main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 18:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't my article. Other than my initial review months ago, I'm not sure why I'm being messaged about this. TheBritinator (talk) 22:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Business Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements (Events facilitated by others): The European Destubathon – a stub improvement contest/editathon from 1–30 April 2025 Tip of the month: When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT. Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited, it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name. Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool) 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women) 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Congratulations, TheBritinator! The list you nominated, List of cabinets of Liechtenstein, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]