Besides being utter nonsense. talk pages are not for discussion of the subject of an article. Doug Weller talk 06:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are no fun. In the future I will simply silently appreciate the schizos I find instead of alerting the languishing gerontocracy to remove them. Someday the iPad babies will inherit this coven and on that day the asylum doors shall never be locked again. LOVECEL ^🤍 17:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

great wiki user Zzendaya (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lovecel what part of the existing inline sources justify this content you restored [1]? Badbluebus (talk) 23:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson, 2021 LOVECEL ^🤍 23:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That source [2] makes no mention of japan. Badbluebus (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look harder or give up LOVECEL ^🤍 23:39, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The tone of your reply seems to imply that you are trolling instead of trying to build an encyclopedia. If you don't provide a serious answer for that content to stay up, I will have to revert your edit. Badbluebus (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

God forbid you have to search a PDF. Do what you must. LOVECEL ^🤍 23:45, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I searched it myself, nothing found. There's a search feature on the page. Please provide a quotation backing your claim. Doug Weller talk 07:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Equal Rights Amendment shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Badbluebus (talk) 23:55, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I literally fixed it from your feedback. No warfare it's collaborative editing. We are united. LOVECEL ^🤍 23:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]