Fine, I will re-read the articles/links that you have sent to me previously and I will refer to them, in case of any error on my part. I'll try to see if there are any errors. Please, do not have me blocked. Please revert your complaint from the Administrators' Board. Let's just settle this and make peace. Kishore Editing - 16:75 (IST) 28 January, 2022

Hello, I just wanted to ask about your reasoning for rerating the Ferré-class submarine to start-class. I don't want to seem combative, I just want to know so I can better understand the rating system. Of course, there is some variation in assessments between who's reviewing the page, but I want to know what you thought the article lacked for B (or even C) class. Thanks, Tylermack999 (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The big one is: the specifications are listed, not in prose. Needs to be in prose. Everything in the infobox needs to be in prose and cited. See Bismarck-class battleship for how to set up a warship articles structurally. Beyond that, the tense "would be" is wrong. Should read "were scrapped". Batteries needs to be linked. The the non-naval reader, a battery is a thing you put in your TV remote. The word "purchase" is used twice in the same sentence. Next sentence "would be" used again.

The background section needs expansion. Why did they choose submarines, in the previous paragraph they said they were looking at cruisers? Why would what Ecuador is doing affect what Peru is doing? That is background info that needs to in the background section. Was there a recent war between the two? Competition for fishing grounds or territory? As for cites, Navypedia.org, Naval Encyclopedia, www.submarinesonstamps.co.il, laststandonzombieisland are not great WP:RS. Conway's Fighting Ships is free to access at archive.org (you just need an account) and probably has all the specifications and building history you require. Furthermore there might be some info on why Ecuador and Peru were competing. Hope that helps. Llammakey (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Crusader 1865 ship has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 10 § Crusader 1865 ship until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 11:12, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see ongoing discussion at Talk:List of Memorial Cup champions, and comment if you want. Flibirigit (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]