User talk:Hide on Rosé/Header

Archives

Archive 1

Hello, I'm 176.33.244.31. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Hello Hide on Rosé! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 176.33.244.31 (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

@176.33.244.31 Tell me, did I make mistakses? Hide on Rosé (thảo luận | đóng góp | trung ương) 11:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. 176.33.244.31 (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you moving user pages to "Renamed user..." names? This isn't helpful in any way, please stop. Canterbury Tail talk 12:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail Apologize for my mistake, I didn't uncheck the "Suppress creation of redirects" in rename user interface. Thanks a lot, I'll take care of it. Hide on Rosé (thảo luận | đóng góp | trung ương) 13:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you revert the rename that you did of this user? As the block message states, they're currently blocked primarily because of their username, and thus need a rename before an unblock would be possible. stwalkerster (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stwalkerster I think user must be unblocked before requesting username change; @DreamRimmer What do you suggest? Hide on Rosé (thảo luận | đóng góp | trung ương) 23:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're not going to be unblocked before their username is changed - that's just not how username blocks on enwiki work. Normally, I'd expect them to use the {{unblock-un}} template to request a rename and that rename would then be actioned as part of the unblock process. Yes, this is already a little bit backwards because of the lack of use of that template, but given the block reason is solely for their username I (still) see zero reason for the block to prevent a rename. I don't like how we've collectively messed this user around over something that should be very straight-forward, but I'm gonna drop it for now as I've got other stuff to be getting on with. stwalkerster (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hide on Rosé, If there is a rename request from a user who is blocked on English Wikipedia solely because of their username, their request should be approved. In my opinion, we should leave these types of requests for renamers who are administrators on English Wikipedia so that the renaming and unblocking can be actioned at the same time. – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Hide on Rosé (thảo luận | đóng góp | trung ương) 03:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HoR, I'm kinda a newbie renamer, but I was under the impression that we gave responses a week/7 days, am I incorrect? - FlightTime (open channel) 16:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think 3 days is minimum. Phạm Ngọc Phương Linh (T • C • CA • L • B) 02:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seven days is more like it. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hide on Rosé, I think your signature goes against WP:CUSTOMSIG/P.

Specifically,

• A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username.
• A distracting, confusing, or otherwise unsuitable signature.

I'm not forcing you to change it, I'm just letting you know that you should consider changing it. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I put in a username request about a month ago, I am not trying to canvass to get you to accept it but I was under the impression that it would be a 7-day wait period and it’s now been a month. Any update? Thecowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 13:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 13:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many unsourced claims in my opinion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trần Cẩm Tú and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hide on Rosé! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Self-warning Phương Linh (thảo luận) 14:39, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]