Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
- I am absolutely certain that this is an automated message, but thank you anyway! HKLionel (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, the message is semi-automated boilerplate. Actual human volunteers post to talk pages, whether done by their hand or fired-off by a bot they run. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry! Thank you for your effort! I just made a page and I would like to know when the "under construction" template is usually removed. I cannot finish it right now but I will tomorrow, so I am worried if there is an automated process or something like that if I take too long. Thanks! HKLionel (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- {{Under construction/doc}} says specifically that
"this template should not be used for new articles with little or no content"
so I've moved what you created to Draft:Albania in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2012 so you can develop it without worrying about immediate deletion. All articles need to be supported by reliable sources and an event will have to demonstrate general notability. I caution new editors against creating new articles because it won't help you develop as a constructive editor. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)- Oh, forgot that draft pages exist. Sorry and thank you! Since I have seen other articles that are of the same topic, for example "Belarus in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2012", I thought that this would be a topic of general notability. Thanks! HKLionel (talk) 01:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- The original page was a redirect and now there is no redirect and the article is also admin-only, can you re-add the redirect to the page? I prob will take a while to finish the draft, thx HKLionel (talk) 07:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- There's no need for a redirect although per WP:REDDEAL you might remove any remaining red links to it; I've removed the red link from a couple navigation templates. You can focus on improving the draft. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- {{Under construction/doc}} says specifically that
- Oh, sorry! Thank you for your effort! I just made a page and I would like to know when the "under construction" template is usually removed. I cannot finish it right now but I will tomorrow, so I am worried if there is an automated process or something like that if I take too long. Thanks! HKLionel (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, the message is semi-automated boilerplate. Actual human volunteers post to talk pages, whether done by their hand or fired-off by a bot they run. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Memo
WikiProject Eurovision
Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the Swedish flag The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week.
Cordially, |
Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

- Hi HKLionel! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 05:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
Elli (talk | contribs) 22:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Relisting
Please do not relist discussions when there is clear consensus, e.g. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_1#Category:People_from_Fort_Liberty,_North_Carolina and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_1#Category:Former_Stardust_Promotion_artists. Either close the discussion or leave it alone so that someone else can close it. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- For the former, LaundryPizza03 proposed merging, which is different from the nom's proposal of renaming. For the latter, I concur as both the nom and the vote agreed on merging; my mistake. Should I close it? Cheers, it's lio! | talk | work 07:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Marcocapelle: ping just in case. it's lio! | talk | work 11:26, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- With respect to the former, that is just an unfortunate misunderstanding. The target is a redirect so merge and rename are the same in this particular case. I think it is too confusing to close now after you already relisted it. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh dear, my sincere apologies. When relisting I don't analyze the discussion as thoroughly. Will note that in the future. Have a good day, it's lio! | talk | work 11:42, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks -- I've just completed moving the category entries over and finalizing the rename. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 22:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh dear, my sincere apologies. When relisting I don't analyze the discussion as thoroughly. Will note that in the future. Have a good day, it's lio! | talk | work 11:42, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- With respect to the former, that is just an unfortunate misunderstanding. The target is a redirect so merge and rename are the same in this particular case. I think it is too confusing to close now after you already relisted it. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Marcocapelle: ping just in case. it's lio! | talk | work 11:26, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Category: Law of Middle East and North Africa
Thanks for getting involved with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_20#Category:Law_of_Middle_East_and_North_Africa. It's helpful to know that AnonymousPurpose is using AI--explains a lot.
I haven't been involved in a consultation like this before. As I understand it, it's decided by content of arguments, rather than mere votes. I've tried to respond substantively to questions and arguments, but have received almost no replies. I find it hard to accept that this would be settled on the basis of vote counting. Will Hanley (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Will Hanley: No, I'm not vote counting, I just wanted to summarize the proposed solutions and the stances of everyone involved in it, especially as the latter tended to change along with the discussion, both for my own clarity (if I do eventually make a close) and for everyone else's. You provide very strong arguments and have remained civil in the discussion. Have a good day, it's lio! | talk | work 15:35, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
My revert
I reverted your accepted edit out of an abundance of caution as, despite the edit summary of the edit in question, the image has not been removed from the article in the last 100 revisions per WikiBlame. I thus suspect nefarious intentions, especially given the subject matter, and am investigating further. Iseult Δx talk to me 03:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for the head up and your work. Have a good day, it's lio! | talk | work 03:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hello HKLionel! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
CVUA
Hi there! I am just informing you that your CVUA course is ready. It is located here. Happy patrolling! ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Noted with thanks - it's lio! | talk | work 12:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I've reverted, once again, your entry on this article. It is very clear from both WP:DOYCITE and the page notice prominently displayed when you edit this article that all new entries are required to have an inline citation. There are editors who are actively working to find citations for all existing entries. You may wish to join this effort, if so please see WP:DAYS. Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Kiwipete: see here. again, my brain must not have been working properly when I could've just added citations myself. cheers, it's lio! | talk | work 17:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC)