• If anyone claims to be my "doppelganger" or "clone," please block on sight
• If you need page protection, please report at WP:RfPP
• Any admin should feel free to undo an admin action of mine without prior discussion. A ping would be nice. I unblock high-risk appellants. Sometimes it does not work out. It would not be wheel-warring to reblock the recidivistic among them.

User talk:Deepfriedokra/archives

I wrote my first article about a unique topic and it got deleted by you I think.

I wrote it aboit this company here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2024/07/06/tiktokers-push-facial-gum-for-chiseled-jaws-but-wheres-the-evidence/

this is Stronger Gum's website: https://www.strongergum.com/

here is additional citation for the founder's story: https://www.unrealinternet.com/rockstars/founder-portraits/the-founders-series-decembers-uk-founders-building-businesses-that-matter-not-just-profit%20 Veetwikicreations (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Veetwikicreations: Thanks for your note. Please read the deletion notice I left on your talk page. The links you have posted here do not meet the requirement for significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Once again, please read the notice I left on your talk page. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just declined UTRS appeal #98962, and wonder whether you think removing UTRS access would be a good idea. 🤔 JBW (talk) 20:30, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Oh. Them again. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 JBW (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, on 30 Dec -23 you renewed this user's IPBE for another year, and at the same time set their EC status also to expire in a year. Given that the EC was previously permanent, I assume that was a clerical error, or was there an actual reason for it? They've queried this, and in response I've set the EC as permanent. Let me know if I shouldn't have, and I'll revert. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing: Looks like a misclick. Thanks/ -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the business link(s) and submitted for review. I read your message. I am NOT intentionally breaking wiki rules. I am trying to learn. Lbarnett777 (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lbarnett777: Please read the messages I left on you talk page. Including the information linked in the messages. It is improved, but still needs work. When it is ready, click the submit button. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But some of the poorest and shoddy work that I have seen for a long time. Thank you for blocking them. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:49, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: You're welcome. I love to rock-and-roll. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:50, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These people spend so much time and energy learning how to write ad copy they don't realize how easy it is to see. I've been seeing and reading ads for mumblety-mumble years. It's like they stand up and wave at me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:53, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schlacke ist. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used to write advertorial and press releases. They're so easy to spot.

That German tag must be good idiomatic slang. Google gets me "Slag is" but that doesn't really work 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:37, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schlock. Tripe. Trash. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Fritter. When you moved User:Lbarnett777 to Draft:Heather Brazell Hill, it looks like you left the userpage as a redirect. Was that intentional? Bishonen | tålk 10:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Yes. Probably no lpnger needed. Just wanted them to be able to find it after I moved it. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will you take a look at my draft and see if it is acceptable so far? Lbarnett777 (talk) 19:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lbarnett777: Thanks for asking. What jumpss out at first is the use of her first name. Needs to be last name. First name is too familiar. Not sure she meets the relevant notability requirement, WP:NPOL, so will need to meet WP:ANYBIO and/or WP:GNG. Subjects of articles must meet inclusion requirements with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. You can also request help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.Hope this helps. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined UTRS appeal #101356, but I've also left a comment there which you may like to consider. JBW (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had declined it, but it turns out that I didn't. However, you still may like to consider my suggestion. JBW (talk) 22:45, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Ah, more schlock. how delightful. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:46, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meh. I like to try to give them three tries before banning. Perhaps they will make a surprisingly to the point response to me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:52, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I wasn't sure myself about it, and I'm happy to accept your decision. If you mean 3 tries at UTRS, then obviously we aren't there yet, but if we count both UTRS and talk page, then we are up to 4 appeals which just say "I'm so incompetent that I can't even use ChatBot to write an appeal, let alone write one myself", and nothing else. 🥴 JBW (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]