Sõda

MEEDIAVALVUR: algab „sõjalise erioperatsiooni“ teine etapp nimega „SÕDA“

I stand with the people of Ukraine against Vladimir Putin's aggression.



Click here for continuously rotating teserract



Editing preferences (not specific to Wikipedia):

In my first formal computer science class, the second assignment was to write a program to put a list of birthdays in date order. While many of us were manipulating the names of months, the brighter students converted the dates to ISO 8601 format. Then, the sorting is trivial and the dates can be re-converted on output. I have never forgotten that lesson, so I always use ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD) all-numeric dates. For consistency, I also use the equivalent long form (e.g. 1987 October 10) whenever possible, even to the extent of writing out the name of the month rather than filling someone's little boxes. Done so, the date is completely unambiguous. However, that standard is used by only a few countries, plus me. Since Wikipedia isn't among the few, I opt for the reverse format (e.g. 10 October 1987) which is recognized worldwide except China and the United States. (Apparently, dates makes strange bedfellows.) Thusly, I avoid the use of a comma in the date.

Avoiding unnecessary commas brings me to another preference: thorough and accurate use of punctuation. Punctuation isn't used enough by many editors, possibly because they fear getting it wrong. You will recognize my editing trail by the liberal sprinklings of commas, dashes, and semicolons. These help convey thoughts to the reader. I am not immune to mistakes, so feel free to leave a note if you disagree.


Wikipedia preferences:

I don’t knowingly deviate from the Manual of Style…even if I don’t agree with it!

Zero tolerance for jargon. Articles should be understandable by anyone with basic reading skills. The ubiquitous use of abbreviations on Talk pages deters new editors and sets a very bad example.

Write an informative edit summary. Occasionally—such as when I am engrossed in a series of edits—I forget; feel free to remind me. I also believe in clear and complete discussion on Talk pages. If it has taken me significant time and energy to understand an issue, I document it for editors who may revisit the topic.


Tag Background info from Wikipedia namespace
{{according to whom}}
links talk 
[according to whom?]
{{additional citation needed}}
links talk 
[additional citation(s) needed]
{{attribution needed}}
links talk 
[attribution needed]
{{better source needed}}
links talk 
[better source needed]
{{better source needed example}}
links talk 
[better source needed] Links to self-sourcing examples
{{by whom}}
links talk 
[by whom?]
{{chronology citation needed}}
links talk 
[chronology citation needed]
{{circular reference}}
links talk 
[circular reference] When the sources copy Wikipedia material directly
{{circular reporting}}
links talk 
[circular reporting?] For the subtler case when you suspect the sources are based on facts first published at Wikipedia, but they didn't copy it directly
{{citation needed}}
links talk 
[citation needed]
{{citation needed span}}
links talk 
The sun is hot.[citation needed]
{{clarify}}
links talk 
[clarification needed]
{{copyvio link}}
links talk 
[infringing link?]
{{dead link}}
links talk 
[dead link]
{{disambiguation needed}}
links talk 
[disambiguation needed]
{{disputed inline}}
links talk 
[disputeddiscuss]
{{dubious}}
links talk 
[dubiousdiscuss]
{{episode needed}}
links talk 
[episode needed]
{{example needed}}
links talk 
[example needed]
{{example needed span}}
links talk 
This is a claim that needs one or more examples.[example needed]
{{excessive citations inline}}
category links talk 
For abuse of citations, per Wikipedia:Citation overkill.
[excessive citations]
{{explain}}
links talk 
[further explanation needed]
{{failed verification}}
links talk 
[failed verification]
{{full citation needed}}
links talk 
[full citation needed]
{{how}}
links talk 
[how?]
{{medical citation needed}}
links talk 
[medical citation needed]
{{medical citation needed span}}
links talk 
This is an uncited biomedical claim.[medical citation needed]
{{nonspecific}}
links talk 
[not specific enough to verify]
{{not verified in body}}
links talk 
[not verified in body]
{{original research inline}}
links talk 
[original research?]
{{page needed}}
links talk 
[page needed]
{{primary source inline}}
links talk 
[non-primary source needed]
{{quantify}}
links talk 
[quantify]
{{quote without source}}
links talk 
[This quote needs a citation]
{{registration required}}
links talk 
(registration required)
{{request quotation}}
links talk 
[need quotation to verify]
{{season needed}}
links talk 
[season and episode needed]
{{self-published inline}}
category links talk 
[self-published source?]
{{self-published source}}
category links talk 
[self-published source]
{{specify}}
category links talk 
[specify]
{{synthesis inline}}
links talk 
[improper synthesis?]
{{third-party inline}}
links talk 
[independent source needed]
{{unreliable medical source}}
links talk 
[unreliable medical source?]
{{unreliable source?}}
links talk 
[unreliable source?]
{{update after}}
links talk 
[needs update]
{{user-generated inline}}
category links talk 
[user-generated source?]
{{user-generated source}}
category links talk 
[user-generated source]
{{vague}}
links talk 
[vague]
{{verify quote}}
links talk 
[verify]
{{verify source}}
links talk 
[verification needed]
{{volume needed}}
links talk 
[volume & issue needed]
{{when}}
links talk 
[when?]
{{where}}
links talk 
[where?]
{{which}}
links talk 
[which?]
{{who}}
links talk 
[who?]
{{whose quote}}
links talk 
[who said this?]
{{why}}
links talk 
[why?]
{{year missing}}
links talk 
[year missing] Use when the year of publication of a source is needed
{{year needed}}
links talk 
[year needed] Use when the date of an event is needed


This user is a participant in
WikiProject Women's History.

Humphrey Tribble (talk) 03:16, 17 April 2021 (UTC)


Special:Prefixindex/User: Humphrey Tribble

=================================================

Subdirectories

Kommenteeri