This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Aviation: Airlines This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article is supported by the airline project. New York City Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Utah Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Mid-importance).

JetBlue's participation in a codeshare with American is ending on 7/20/2023 per an email I received from JetBlue 2607:FB91:D1F:8A4A:AC39:9931:E32C:86BF (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, team. I noticed that this page was moved from "JetBlue" to "jetBlue".

From my understanding of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks, while we do use camel case in certain situations for letters in the middle of a trademarked name, we generally do not use it to for the first letter, which is still left capitalized. The only exception is for cases where only the second letter is capitalized (e.g., iPhone), which does not apply here. See MOS:TMLOWER.

Further, in both secondary sources (newspapers, etc.) and JetBlue's own Form 10-K, "JetBlue" is used with a capital J. I suggest moving the page back. Precision123 (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly speaking, the page wasn't moved—article titles can't begin with a lowercase letter—but I agree with you and have removed {{lowercase title}} to restore the previous capitalization. Conifer (talk) 08:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that an edit changed the infobox from listing JetBlue's "focus cities" to listing its "operating bases." I am not stating an opinion about this but wanted to point it out for clarity. For the record, JetBlue refers to them as "focus cities." However, its classification of Los Angeles as such may now be shaky, given the recent route cuts there. Was there another reason for this edit that I am not aware of? Thank you. Precision123 (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The jetBlue history section is too long and granular. It needs its own article and editing. Then a lede summary can be excerpted into the jetBlue article so it doesn't obscure what jetBlue is. See the United Airlines and History of United Airlines as an example. Norco3921 (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TOOBIG, I don't really think this article is so long that splitting is necessary at this time, though I'd defer to other editors. DonIago (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The primary issue is it is not a history, but a play by play. Someone who knows the history should write a better narrative history. Norco3921 (talk) 14:57, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but that wasn't your original suggestion. DonIago (talk) 21:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]