Sõda

MEEDIAVALVUR: algab „sõjalise erioperatsiooni“ teine etapp nimega „SÕDA“

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 20:00, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 02:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @Gonzo fan2007: I will do this review. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:39, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

Images all have captions where needed. Also none of them need fair use rationals. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no edit warring. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Article also doesn't seem objectionably biased. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article has the right level of detial, not too much, not too little for what I would except in a game article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll choose 5 random sources to spotcheck, 2, 14, 4, 7, and 25. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:58, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
2 passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
14 does provide an example about analasys being mostly near the end. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:01, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
4 passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:03, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
7 passes. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:04, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
25 passes as does the whole spotcheck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:05, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Earwig finds no issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed all grammar issues myself. This is a very good article and I will pass it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:15, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kommenteeri