Sõda

MEEDIAVALVUR: algab „sõjalise erioperatsiooni“ teine etapp nimega „SÕDA“

Featured articleEdgar Allan Poe is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 19, 2009.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 24, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
May 30, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 8, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 5, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
January 21, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
October 18, 2008Featured topic candidateNot promoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 29, 2005, January 19, 2020, October 3, 2022, October 3, 2023, and October 3, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

The redirect Poe has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 12 § Poe until a consensus is reached. Wiktorpyk (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAR note

The article has a lot of "citation needed" tags, unsourced statements, is outdated, and isn't comprehensive enough to be FA (for ex. sources at further reading was not implemented). 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify the last point? "Further reading" must be implemented as sources? --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, as far as I recall, FAC Coordinator recommended that all available reliable sources, including scholars should be added t the abody of the rticle. as a content 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 23:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What is an "FAC Coordinator"? Is this perhaps a personal preference? If you find a related policy, please share it. --Midnightdreary (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Read Wikipedia:Featured article candidates 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you but I'm having a hard time finding the relevance of your link. This particular article is not a Featured Article Candidate. I also see no policies regarding a "Further reading" section being required to be converted into citations. Finally, I don't see that this article has been nominated for FAR. Is that something you intend to do? --Midnightdreary (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a policy, but required mostly for the FA articles somehow. Maybe I'm gonna nominate it so that it will be checked and possibly improved by other editors (surely it will since that article is popular), but it is not surprising that other editors will per Wikipedia:Unreviewed featured articles/2020. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 14:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt other editors would improve this article. I brought it to FA to begin with and it's been mostly me working on it for many years now. I guess I better get to work. Thanks for the heads up. --Midnightdreary (talk) 15:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is actually better to be at FAR so that people can assist you and spot other problems. It can be closed more than a year and even more as long as someone is interested at saving the article. So, there is no need to rush when it is actively at FaR (FAR is not that strict unlike FAC in my experience). 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:07, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kommenteeri