• Unlink Washington, D.C. (MOS:OL).

• Y

• Daniel in the Lions' Den - only Daniel has a capital here.

• Y

• Link National Gallery of Art.

• Y

• currently hangs – currently is redundant.

  Y already removed currently

• Introduce Daniel in the lead and the main text.

• Y done a rework. Please correct it again

• There is no need for the link to the website in the infobox – it is linked already in the references section (twice it seems).

  • N It comes with the template. I can't remove it. Do i need to make it manual?

 Done AM

• The lead needs to be expanded, as it is currently does not "summarize the body of the article with appropriate weight" (MOS:LEAD}.

• Y already did. Please give me suggestion what's missing

I agree with you - no further action needed. AM

• The image of Rubens causes sandwiching (MOS:SANDWICH)and needs to be removed.

• Y

• Link and introduce Rubens (using his full name).

Y someone remove my writing about Ruben cause they said it's irrelevant. I already returned it back.

• Link Duke of Mantua.

  Y

• classical sculptures like - ‘classical sculptors such as’ or ‘classical sculptures by’.

  Y by

• Dying Alexander should be in italics. Ditto The Penitent Saint Jerome (not Jerome).

  Y

• both of these - 'both of these works’.

  Y

• The painting was created - ‘Daniel in the Lions' Den was created’.

  Y

• piece and for whom it was originally intended is still unknown—add a comma between and and intended.

  Y

• Link Charles I; Secretary of State (Secretary of State (England)).

  Y

• Unlink London (MOS:OL).

  Y

• Move the link for Scotland to where it first appears.

  Y

• Rachel Aviva Pollack needs to be introduced.

  Y

• Painting of Jerome that became inspiration for the seated position—the caption requires additional text to show the origin of the work—'Cornelis Cort, Girolomo Muziano, Saint Jerome Penitent in the Wilderness (undated), Tartu University Library.

  Y can you rework it.

• Readers may be unfamiliar with the biblical story—a summary of it should be included in this section.

  Y

• It may be worthwhile including a short biographical summary about the artist here—entirely optional, but imo it improves the article a lot.

  Y already did, you can see

• Use Leonardo’s full name.

  Y

• Link Dudley Carleton - he should be introduced in the text. Y

not yet introduced - who was he? Amitchell125 (talk) 13:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already did. he is 1st Viscount Dorchester and fine art enjoyer who also an ambassador for Charles I. I already put it in the text Agus Damanik (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carleton is ambassador for James I who is King of England at that time in The Hague and also an admirer for fine art. Rubens and Carleton met in September 1616 after Carleton had been promoted from his former ambassadorship in when he encountered his old acquaintance Tobie Matthew and George Gage at destination spa cause he suffered gallstone. During this encounter, they escorted Carleton to Antwerp, where he visited artists' studios, including Rubens's. Carleton decided to purchase The Wolf and Fox Hunt with help from Matthew, Gage and William Trumbull, but negotiations fell through when Rubens sold the painting to the Duke of Aarschot. However, Rubens agreed to paint a smaller version for Carleton in exchange for a chain of diamonds. Agus Damanik (talk) 14:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Link National Gallery of Art and give its location.

  Y

• who received it as part of a negotiation with Rubens – is redundant and can be deleted, as the text reappears in a similar form further down in the paragraph.

  Y

• entirely by Rubens himself – himself is redundant.

  Y

• However, Rubens – However seems unnecessary here.
• Y
• April 28, 1618 – a minor point, but 28 April, 1618 is preferable, as the numbers are separated.

  Y

• Later, in 1628 – Later is redundant.

  Y

• 'Viscount’ (not viscount) in the link.

  Y

• that was held by Christie, Manson & Woods on the first day of the sale on June 17, 1882 - 'held at Christie’s, on 17 June, 1882‘?.

  why change the name into Christie's. At this time, the name is Christie, Manson & Woods

agreed. AM

• Who were Duncan, Keatley and Jamieson?

  They are their attendant, do I need to remove it

Yes, their names are unimportant here. AM

• Y already removed

• Introduce Christopher Beckett Denison.

  Y

• sold it to the United States – this makes no sense—‘sold it to the United States Government’?

  Y already removed and a new information

• What is the painting's exhibition history, other than it is on display at the NGA?

  *Y

• Link oil paint; Book of Daniel.

  Y

• Unlink realism, as it is within quotes.

  Y

• had access to exotic animals due to his role as a court painter - why would this be true?

  Y

• eighty years old – consider simplifying to ‘80’,

  Y

• of the incident – is redundant text.

  Y

• 'The Sketch of a lion by Rubens' image is in the wrong section.

  Y

• 'The Study for Daniel' image is causing sandwiching (MOS:SANDWICH), and should be removed.

  Y

• Convert 224 x 330 cm using Template:Convert.

  Y

• Move the link to Daniel to where he first appears in the text.

  Y

• Consider linking praying.

  Y

• Leopards – why are these mentioned, are they depicted in the painting?

  Y already removed

• Ref 9 PubHist; Ref 14 the art inspector – what makes you think they are both reliable sources?

  The ref 9 i realize is quite not reliable. Will change it

  Y

  The ref 14 is quite trusty, the one running the website and the writer for the article is having master in Art History. I don't know, i love if you have differed opinion

  Y

N She is not a published author or academic, and her degrees not make her or the others reliable on Wikipedia.

Amitchell125 (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitchell125

Y already removed

• The Internet Archive has links to two of the sources, which I would consider using – D’Hulst (https://archive.org/details/rubensoldtestame0001huls/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater) and Harris (https://archive.org/details/seventeenthcentu0000harr/page/n3/mode/2up).

  Y

• Ref 1 and Ref 13 appear to be from the same source (NGA website).

  Y already removed

• The link here also appears in the references section, and so should not be included here. This means the Commons link should be moved to the references section (to avoid it being on its own).

• Y

• 'Daniel in the Lion's Den c1615 Peter Paul Rubens' requires a US copyright tag.

• Y

• 'Dying Alexander-Uffizi.1' is incorrectly licensed.

• Y

• 'Cornelis Cort, da Girolomo Muziano, San Girolamo' requires a US copyright tag.

• Y

• 'Peter Paul Rubens 077' requires a US copyright tag.

• Y