| |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reverts
El C, I edit Wikipedia occassionally. Please let me know what is wrong with the first paragraph you removed by this edit. The source used does say that.
Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2021
Please change X (no info) to "Several thousand supporters of Hefazat-e-Islam’s leader Mamunul Haque in Bangladesh attacked a Hindu village in March 2021, which resulted in the ransacking and looting of many houses and the vandalization of 70-80 houses."[1]
References
- ^ "Extremist Islamist group's supporters attack 70-80 Hindu houses in Bangladesh: Police". India Today. 20 March 2021.
Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024
Please add this in the Bangladesh section: Hindus are fleeing Bangladesh localities due to being attacked and vandalism of temples.[1][2] 2406:7400:90:9B1A:C9B8:5A21:12EC:1FBC (talk) 08:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Not done: These sources have a lot of information that deserve to be in the article, what you have suggested reduces this significantly. I think more information from the sources should be included. Ultraodan (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Mishra, Ashutosh (2024-11-29). "Hindus flee Bangladesh locality after temples attacked, cops turn blind eye". India Today. Retrieved 2024-11-30.
- ^ Three Hindu temples in Bangladesh's Chattogram vandalised, 2024-11-29, ISSN 0013-0389, retrieved 2024-11-30
Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024
Please add this to the Bangladesh section: Another temple burnt in Bangladesh-Hindus attacked citing this reference https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/attack-on-iskcon-centre-burnt-in-bangladesh-hindus-attacked-muhammed-yunus-2646443-2024-12-07 49.205.129.82 (talk) 10:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: This needs more information to be included. Ultraodan (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 9 January 2025
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by the proposer at 13:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC) as recorded below. (closed by non-admin page mover) — BarrelProof (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Anti-Hindu sentiment → Hinduphobia – The title should be WP:CONCISE.
- Moreover, the ngram results show "Hinduphobia" is a better title.
- Some sources- [1][2] [3] [4] [5] [6][7] PPicazHist (talk) 08:12, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not scholarly and also not common. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 10:37, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- on what basis you claim that? PPicazHist (talk) 11:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Support:already voted - he/she is the proposer The google news [8] show its a widely used term. PPicazHist (talk) 11:20, 9 January 2025 (UTC)- Scholarly writing of Rajiv Malhotra in his book Hinduphobia: A Critique of Wendy Doniger’s Erotic School of Indology. PPicazHist (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Rajiv Malhotra is a Hindutva ideologue and not a scholar. You should read WP:RS. - Ratnahastin (talk) 11:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Scholarly writing of Rajiv Malhotra in his book Hinduphobia: A Critique of Wendy Doniger’s Erotic School of Indology. PPicazHist (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose - Hinduphobia and Anti-Hindu sentiment are vastly different concepts. "Hinduphobia" is a neologism invented by the Hindutva right wing to limit the academic discourse on many topics and has been rejected by scholars as being both ahistorical and inappropriate. [1] The sources cited by OP are a testament to this as most of them are from hindu pressure groups or Hindu nationalist aligned Godi media. - Ratnahastin (talk) 11:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Bad Faith Bias Claims". Hindutva Harassment Field Manual. 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2025-01-09.
- Oppose - I do not think that Ngrams really do support "Hinduphobia", if you compare "anti-Hindu" with "Hinduphobia" it is clear that "Hinduphobia" and "Hinduphobic" are rare terms in English; a more common term is "anti-Hindu".[9] -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Toddy1 Hmm, I agree with you. Your ngram results are better. Thanks !
- We would need some good years for this term to be popularized. This was just in the mainstream news today, so I thought it would be good. @Ratnahastin Not all news portals are Godi media, are they?
- I take my proposal back, any editor can close this discussion.
- PPicazHist (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I said "most" not "all". - Ratnahastin (talk) 13:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Moreover, You must know that even Godi media is a term coined by the leftists. I neither support lefts,not the rights. I support only truth. @Ratnahastin, Let's not escalate it further PPicazHist (talk) 13:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I said "most" not "all". - Ratnahastin (talk) 13:04, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Toddy1 Hmm, I agree with you. Your ngram results are better. Thanks !
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.