Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany/Prussia task force/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Prussia task force.

This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Prussia-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the Wikipedia 1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Germany}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of the Prussia articles by quality category, which serves as the foundation for an automatically-generated worklist.

While yes, WikiProject Germany does assess ratings for this task force, as it's, well, a task force, in some cases the ratings of WP:PRUSSIA and WP:GERMANY can still differ.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the § requesting an assessment section below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Prussia WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the § requesting an assessment section below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternatively, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

There were no logs for this project from February 14, 2026 - February 21, 2026.

2011–2012 assessments

September 19, 2012

Reassessed

September 17, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

September 16, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

September 11, 2012

Reassessed

September 9, 2012

Assessed

September 5, 2012

Renamed
Reassessed
Assessed
Removed

August 26, 2012

Renamed
Reassessed
Assessed
Removed

August 12, 2012

Reassessed
Removed

August 10, 2012

Assessed

July 31, 2012

Assessed

July 10, 2012

Assessed

July 10, 2012

Assessed

July 10, 2012

Assessed

June 27, 2012

Reassessed

June 26, 2012

Assessed

June 22, 2012

Assessed

June 18, 2012

Reassessed
Removed

June 16, 2012

Assessed

June 15, 2012

Reassessed

June 13, 2012

Reassessed
  • Kamerun (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
Assessed

June 9, 2012

Reassessed

June 5, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

May 31, 2012

Removed

May 26, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

May 16, 2012

Assessed

May 11, 2012

Assessed

May 9, 2012

Assessed

April 30, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

April 21, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

April 21, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

April 18, 2012

Assessed

April 17, 2012

Assessed

April 15, 2012

Assessed

April 14, 2012

Reassessed

April 11, 2012

Assessed

April 10, 2012

Assessed

April 8, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

March 16, 2012

Assessed

March 10, 2012

Assessed

March 9, 2012

Reassessed

March 7, 2012

Assessed

March 6, 2012

Reassessed
  • Berlin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

March 3, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

March 2, 2012

Assessed
Removed

March 1, 2012

Removed

February 29, 2012

Assessed

February 27, 2012

Assessed

February 24, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

February 23, 2012

Reassessed

February 9, 2012

Assessed

February 2, 2012

Assessed

February 1, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

January 30, 2012

Removed

January 9, 2012

Reassessed

January 3, 2012

Renamed
Assessed

December 30, 2011

Renamed
Assessed

December 26, 2011

Reassessed

December 23, 2011

Assessed

December 19, 2011

Renamed
Reassessed
Assessed

December 15, 2011

Assessed

December 9, 2011

Assessed

December 5, 2011

Assessed

December 2, 2011

Assessed

November 28, 2011

Assessed

November 27, 2011

Reassessed
Assessed

November 22, 2011

Assessed

November 17, 2011

Assessed

November 16, 2011

Renamed
Assessed

November 14, 2011

Assessed

November 12, 2011

Assessed

November 10, 2011

Reassessed
Assessed

November 5, 2011

Renamed
Assessed

November 1, 2011

Reassessed
Assessed

October 28, 2011

Assessed

October 26, 2011

Reassessed
Assessed

October 20, 2011

Assessed