Hi, can you please reopen the move request? The moratorium will expire in just a few days. Otherwise, I will have to raise a move review, which I'd rather avoid. Vpab15 (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vpab15 As you said, the moratorium ends soon. At that time a new discussion can be made. There is no rush, so waiting 5 more days is not a big deal. -- ZooBlazer 20:43, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) There is no harm in waiting until after the consensus-imposed moratorium period ends. What is the point in having a consensus if some don't want it upheld? Remember, WP:NORUSH. A move review now would be a waste of editors' time, and this topic has already been debated long enough, so I would refer back to the prior discussions before revisiting any such move request. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 20:59, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Twitter. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Vpab15 (talk) 21:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Go Seahawks! Best of luck in Super Bowl LX! SDudley (talk) 03:28, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Get a life and stop playing Wikipedia police ~2026-81746-8 (talk) 09:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-81746-8 You're upset your vandalism was reverted? -- ZooBlazer 09:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Three is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Real life is getting to me so I'm going to be on a wikibreak for a while. I won't be able to continue my peer review on Horizon Zero Dawn for the foreseeable future. I'm sorry. Good luck. toby ^{(t)(c)(rw)(omo)} 18:53, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Tarlby, I hope it is a good wikibreak. I was just wondering, if the FAC is still open after your break, would you want do a review for it? -- ZooBlazer 07:00, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, ZooBlazer! The list you nominated, 15th NFL Honors, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 11:25, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Why did you revert my page. I deleted the box of box office mojo link because the Numbers seemed more accurate. Iacowriter (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Iacowriter Well, you didn't specify why. Your edit summary was Got get rid of Box Office Mojo link. It's also probably something to bring up on the article's talk page before removing anyway. -- ZooBlazer 05:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for that. I’ll try again. Iacowriter (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Three has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 13:32, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]