Hi @WikiMentor01, thank you for reviewing an article I recently wrote (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjib_Bhattacharjee). I am new to the process so am unaware of what needs to be changed; could you please provide some more specific information as to what else is needed and which areas need to be amended for the article to be approved. Thank you and I appreciate it. Flyhigh223! (talk) 21:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you are very close to it. I have given some suggestions. plz re submit after updates. WikiMentor01 (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply @WikiMentor01. Are these the suggestions you are referring to: "article needs to be re written from NPOV with proper layout and also remove the unsourced info."? I am happy to amend but I am unsure which parts are not neutral, and what is the proper layout? Is this referring to headings? Flyhigh223! (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you should make proper headings, sub headings, dont put everything in one place. like lead, background, early life.... keep most essential info which is supported by good sources, keep the things which is important from encyclopedia point of view, not everything personal is relevant. WikiMentor01 (talk) 10:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @WikiMentor01! Is this better and ready for approval now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjib_Bhattacharjee ? Flyhigh223! (talk) 21:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BETTER. STILL YOU CAN CUT DOWN MANY INFO. WikiMentor01 (talk) 05:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @WikiMentor01, which parts should be removed as I am unsure? Flyhigh223! (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @WikiMentor01, I have edited the page accordingly, please could you check before I resubmit? Thanks Flyhigh223! (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey WikiMentor01, I'm a fellow AfC reviewer. I've re-reviewed two of your reviews, picked at random, as part of the backlog drive, you can see the results on your review log. Your decline of Draft:Maa Vindhyavasini University, Mirzapur was correct, but I believe you were too harsh in declining Kamla Jaan. At the time, the draft cited four sources, two of which were significant coverage in reputable Western news outlets (the New York Times and the BBC) and two of which were decent articles in Indian media. This is enough to meet the general notability guideline, especially as a web search shows that several further sources exist. Additionally, the subject is a local politician who has been dead for several years; there is little chance of self-promotion or undisclosed paid editing here, so there is no need to be especially stringent. As you can see, I've moved the draft to mainspace and cleaned it up a bit – please be a little more careful in future not to decline drafts like this as non-notable. Toadspike [Talk] 22:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS FOR TIME AND FEEDBACK. I AGREE WITH YOUR VIEWS. WikiMentor01 (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey WikiMentor, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I advise you not to use all-caps. On the Internet, it could be interpreted as SHOUTING. I personally don't mind you replying in capital letters, but I worry that if you do this to others (as in the section below) it could be misunderstood. Toadspike [Talk] 19:55, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I never write in capital. It just happened. WikiMentor01 (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Can you please elaborate why the article can not be accepted? Please address the issues so that I can improve it and then re-submit.Reshmaaaa (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE VERY CLOSE TO ACCEPT. REMOVE FEW PROMOTIONAL THINGS IN RECEPTION AND ELSEWHERE. KEEP RELEVANT SOURCES WHICH GIVE IN DEPTH COVERAGE ON TOPIC. KEEP THOSE SOURCES ON TOP OF THE REFERENCE. FIND 1-2 IN DEPTH COVERAGE TO ADD. GOOD LUCK. WikiMentor01 (talk) 11:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @WikiMentor01,you reviewed an article ( Draft:Indian Biogas Association ) and I think it was for the sources not being independent and reliable. From my understanding (as I am new to this), I have added several government links which mention the company's name or work and also added several reputable news sources, and I'm confused now as to why it's getting rejected. Please tell me what area needs amending Harshit Gupta (talk) 11:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still in depth coverage in independent sources are required. just brief mentions are not sufficient for private bodies. plz update and resubmit. WikiMentor01 (talk) 12:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around 2600 drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:35, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	I have to be honest that I was overwhelmed when I saw the AfC backlog just now! Your work at articles for creation is incredible. Thank you so much for being part of the June Backlog Drive eliminators. I miss reviewing drafts, and I hope I am able to get back more actively again. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. So nice of you. WikiMentor01 (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiMentor01, for the second running of the Developing Countries WikiContest, it is now open for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at your submissions page to earn points. The coordinators have addressed some of the queries at the last contest and we are hopeful that it'll turn out great for you—yes, you! If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page.
• Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews. Remember, reviews now award 10 points!
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules for more information or contact a coordinator.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		This is awarded to WikiMentor01 for accumulating more than 200 points during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and sustained efforts in reducing the backlog and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process are sincerely appreciated. Thank you for your participation! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Many people review drafts. You review the reviewers. You peer-reviewed the peer reviewers and supported your fellow Wikipedians. :) This is awarded to WikiMentor01 for completing more than 50 re-reviews during the June 2025 AfC backlog drive. Thank you for your efforts and teamwork! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiMentor01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guna Raj Luitel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We're a month into the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest, with stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard already! Our current top five contestants are:

1. Spookyaki (submissions) – 256 points, mostly from a handful of GAs about women's history in Latin America as well as the 1991 Haitian coup d'état.
2. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 229 points, back with a number of articles on abortion in various African countries.
3. simongraham (submissions) – 213 points, mainly from GAs on species of jumping spiders in both Africa and Azerbaijan.
4. PizzaKing13 (submissions) – 200 points, with five GAs on articles relating to Salvadoran politics, history, and griddle cakes.
5. BeanieFan11 (submissions) – 168 points from a few GAs, a few DYKs, and a few ITNs on athletes from a variety of countries.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier!

On behalf of the coordinators, we'd like to thank all the participants for helping to combat systemic bias on Wikipedia! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiMentor01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Guna Raj Luitel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nirmalburlakoti per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darshak.parmar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:27, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two weeks ago, the 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest came to a close! After three months of stiff competition at the top of the leaderboard, we have our winners. vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions), continuing his work on covering abortion in Africa, comes in third with 692 points. simongraham (submissions) comes in second with 763 points, largely from a slew of good articles about jumping spiders. And returning to the podium for the second year in a row, BeanieFan11 (submissions) takes the Gold Belt Buckle with a mind-boggling 946 points from his series of articles on sportpersons. Congratulations to our winners!

Amazingly, the award for the most countries covered goes to both BeanieFan11 (submissions) and simongraham (submissions), who each submitted articles under 30 flags! BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins for writing the most quality articles (16 good articles). For submitting 16 articles related to El Salvador, PizzaKing13 (submissions) wins the award for most submissions under one country. The award for most submissions related to women goes to both Spookyaki (submissions) (7 biographies about women) and vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) (21 related articles). And for the second year, simongraham (submissions) wins for the most reviews, having submitted 21!

Among the participants' contributions were 2 FAs, 5 FLs, 124 GAs, and an uncounted number of DYKs, ITNs, and reviews of every kind! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year, and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]