Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Your good article nomination of the article Global Saskatchewan is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 02:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KOAT-TV is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gerda Arendt -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article ABC 33/40 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/76.1 FM (2nd nomination). Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KOAT-TV has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gerda Arendt -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WHPI, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This article could use a top-to-bottom rewrite; I gave it a start by making a few copy edits here and there. Here are some search results from Newspapers.com. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Global Saskatchewan has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 10, 18 January 2026

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:28, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful when updating radio station inboxes. Each of the following edits in a twenty minute span has placed the articles in Category:Pages using infobox radio station with unknown parameters, containing parameter typos, incomplete wikification, or resulting in previously available info being hidden from the reader: [1], [2], [3], [4]. I would recommended using the "Show preview" button before publishing changes as doing so will show if there are any radio station infobox errors at the top of the page. -JPG-GR (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I should have checked the category before I went to bed @JPG-GR. That's on me. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:06, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KRCB (TV) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:44, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:03, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KRCB (TV) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you were updating radio stations the past few days and recently did for some Canadians stations. I'm doing the same and I know some of the Bell Media stations need to be updated, from the templates, to more citations, to updated and structuring the pages better. Could you continue to do that and I'll try to pitch it? OWaunTon (talk) 17:47, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@OWaunTon I've been focusing on infobox fixes:

• Adding country field
• Removing {{start date and age}} in favor of {{Start date}}
• Fixing the parameter of convert on the Canadian stations to not use American spelling for "meters"
• Removing bolded call sign acronyms
• Occasional other fixes

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 20:38, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but it seems like you're forgetting to add "ubl" for the numbers in the "ERP" parts of stations. OWaunTon (talk) 23:04, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@OWaunTon I'm not sure how to handle some of these extra ERP measurements. Honestly I don't think some of them should be there. So I'm leaving them alone deliberately. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 23:06, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. OWaunTon (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accessibility § SANDWICH Issue. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:13, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Sammi Brie and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Ongoing discussions	News	Current statistics
What to do if nominator has been blocked? Commentary ability for Good Article reviewers (at Village pump)	Sign up for the February 2026 GAN backlog drive	Number of GAs: 43,228 (+40) Number of nominations: 968 (+68) GAs for reassessment: 64 (–4)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | February 2026 Backlog Drive
February 2026 Backlog Drive: On 1 February, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KFTA-TV has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KNWA-TV has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 01:24, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KNWA-TV has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 05:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KFTA-TV has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rhain -- Rhain (talk) 05:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have talked with them on their radio station edits. I have as well, but I don't think it's being heard. I think they have the potential to be a good editor, but I also think they are trying to add all the things and do too much. I don't know if there is a tutor program anymore (there was a long time ago), but I think they would benefit from that. Again, I think the potential is there, they just need guidance (I know neither of us are that guide). Just my two cents. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutralhomer They've been doing some good cleanup; I see Category:Pages using infobox radio station with no country steadily chipping down. But we have lots of complicated page moves. They require specific permissions and tools. In fact, we've had KQRA (FM) and KOSP (FM) at their wrong titles for months, thanks to the shutdown (though today the call sign swap application finally hit the FCC!). Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'll take a look and see if I can help. Normally I called in Mlaffs for page moves, but I see he hasn't edited since May of last year (I hope he's doing OK). So, my page moving skills are not the greatest, but I'll see what I can do. Hope you are doing well. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutralhomer You can ping me or User:Nathan Obral, though he just got page mover. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 01:50, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can and will do. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:58, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. Unfortunately, I am unable to help anymore. Apologizes. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:15, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KDND is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 01:22, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article WZVN-TV is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article WNCN is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KDND has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article WZVN-TV has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 03:37, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article WZVN-TV has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article WNCN has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In light of recent developments, should one of us go through the pages they edited and double check all the information, making changes as needed or do you think that is unnecessary? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Neutralhomer I'm looking at some of the reverts myself. I think some of them were better in Noah's last revision, like KBTC (AM). Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:42, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel like some should be reverted, I have absolutely no problem with you re-reverting. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:13, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick update and we can put this one to bed: He posted this on his talk page. We tried. Sucks this was the outcome. :( Anyway, have a good day. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 15:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The lack of maturity is sad but expected at this point. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 16:47, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

HurricaneZeta^C 12:03, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

National without household registration has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing discussions	News	Current statistics
What should ChristieBot do when an article is moved mid-review? How should ChristieBot notify nominators of malformed nominations? Amount of articles in video game categories Lack of spot check References in a GAN article; and the associated discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates: Identifying locations in sources without page numbers	February 2026 GAN backlog drive continues. Two reviewers are looking for mentors. WikiProject Food and Drink hits 500 Good Articles, with Chiswick Chap and Another Believer together contributing a third.	Number of GAs: 43,446 (+218) Number of nominations: 841 (–127) GAs for reassessment: 46 (–18)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article KITV is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Olliefant -- Olliefant (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Launchballer 00:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bismarck Monument (Hamburg), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Launchballer 12:02, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sammi Brie, I suggested some updates to former Rolling Stone editor Noah Shachtman’s page. I see that you have an interest in media and journalism, so I hope you'll consider reviewing my edit request here: Talk:Noah Shachtman#Additional information. I am available should you have questions. Thanks! RetroCrown (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sammi Brie, I would like to inform you I would like to congratulate two new pages SVS/Triumph Home Video and Keller Entertainment Group! I understand I should let you give them more detail, as it was for production companies! Thanks! DucNguyen0131 (talk) 05:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I already did it. I accidentally informed you and forgot about The Guber-Peters Entertainment Company and The IndieProd Company. Remember I am letting you know I am hoping to expand to get more Variety and Hollywood Reporter sources from ProQuest like with the TV station pages. --DucNguyen0131 (talk) 06:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sammy Brie. Apologies for interrupting your day. I found your name on the GA mentors list and I have a question that I would appreciate an experienced editors' opinion on. I am reviewing Noah Monteiro as part of a GARC. He is a 16-year-old, with the article giving a very, very detailed description of what is predominantly a child's karting career although he has started competing in F4 in the last year. Is this okay for GA? I haven't seen a sports nomination for someone this young before and I haven't done a detailed source analysis yet but it looks pretty solid at first glance bar one or two. I just wanted to ask for a second opinion as the GA article for the 19-year-old Kimi Antonelli, covers his six year period of childhood karting in just two paragraphs (albeit he has achieved a lot more since). Thank you for any advice you can give. Canary757 (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Sammi Brie and is being posted here due to a redirect.)